Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Mitchell Johnson/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User Giants2008 01:07, 13 October 2014 [1].
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Mitchell Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): NG39 (talk) 07:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC), Macosal (talk) 07:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created by Macosal. Then their was one more edit from Macosal and then an edit from FrescoBot. And finally my one edit. You might ask how can a list with only four revisions be up to FL standard and how can a nom only have made one edit to it. Well Macosal's original article was very good and my edit took seven hours and had at least 100 "show previews". In that edit; I completely rewrote the lead, added 2 pictures and more references. Since this nom was filed I have done another four edits (2 DAB fixes, 1 ref fix and a key change). This is my first FLC so any comments positive or negative are welcome -- NickGibson3900 Talk 07:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Did you have a word with Macosal prior to initiating this nomination? —Vensatry (ping) 04:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Vensatry:, I mentioned it on his talk page but he hasn't replied. Considering I wrote all the prose and kept the actual list bit he did I don't see your point - NickGibson3900 Talk 04:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes can confirm I was made aware of the nomination on my talk page. Macosal (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- NickGibson3900, I was just asking you. I see that you have added Macosal as a co-nom. —Vensatry (ping) 18:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Vensatry: Ok cool, sorry for any misunderstanding. BTW would who like to do a full review of this. Your choice. NickGibson3900 Talk 05:25, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Would you like to have a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ICC Champions Trophy centuries/archive1 and Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Asia Cup centuries/archive1? —Vensatry (ping) 18:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Vensatry: Ok cool, sorry for any misunderstanding. BTW would who like to do a full review of this. Your choice. NickGibson3900 Talk 05:25, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- NickGibson3900, I was just asking you. I see that you have added Macosal as a co-nom. —Vensatry (ping) 18:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes can confirm I was made aware of the nomination on my talk page. Macosal (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from --Khadar Khani (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments—
I'll revisit again once the above concerns resolve. --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:36, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – I've made an edit there. Meets the standards! --Khadar Khani (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from —Vensatry (ping) 18:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments from —Vensatry (ping)
—Vensatry (ping) 17:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply] @Vensatry: All done, will comment of your FLCs soon - NickGibson3900 Talk 07:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC) Vensatry Done I think. - NickGibson3900 Talk 05:39, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support - Nice list. Happy to support! —Vensatry (ping) 18:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- Image captions which are complete sentences should use a full stop.
- "during the 2009 Ashes" would prefer to see "series" at the end of that.
- When sorting by wickets, equal wickets with fewer runs is better so should sort in that order.
- Check ref titles for correct use of en-dash for date ranges.
The Rambling Man (talk) 08:58, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: Thanks for the review! Done point 1, 2, 4. As stated above I'm not sure how to do point three. - NickGibson3900 Talk 09:08, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Take a look at the sort key coding on an existing FL of this type. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:10, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: thanks for the tip. I worked it out and it should be fine now. Any more comments or is this list okay now? - NickGibson3900 Talk 07:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 18:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
====Comments by Cowlibob====
Cowlibob (talk) 18:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] @Cowlibob: All done — NickGibson3900 Talk 05:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support - Good job. Cowlibob (talk) 18:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Meets the criteria, well-sourced and well-written. --Carioca (talk) 21:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.