Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by James Anderson/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 19:08, 26 January 2015 [1].

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by James Anderson edit

Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by James Anderson/archive1

Nominator(s): Khadar Khani (talk) 16:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Anderson, the highest wicket taker in international cricket for England, has taken 18 five-wicket hauls at international level. This list includes his Test and ODI fifers, and is based upon pre-existing featured lists of the same category. Since this fulfills the FL criteria so I think this deserves a nomination at FLC. Comments and suggestion are appreciated! Regards, --Khadar Khani (talk) 16:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*The lead profile image is of such low quality, I'd be tempted to just go with one from far away of him bowling.

Unless I've miscounted, there are 42 players with at least 15 hauls according to ref 4.
According to refs, he's a fast-medium bowler. Update the figures taking into account the tri-series that's going on. It's now 185 ODIs, 261 wickets in ODIs.
Elaborate on what the NBC award is for, According to the wiki, it's for Most Promising Young Player in each of county teams, which he won for Lancashire.
need to add cite next to the joint 26th comment.

Cowlibob (talk) 11:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cowlibob: fixed them all! --Khadar Khani (talk) 12:25, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Another good list. Make sure to update the figures after the tri-series or put as of a certain date as he's sure to get more wickets pretty soon. Cowlibob (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I'll surely update the article after the tri-series. Thanks for the support! --Khadar Khani (talk) 23:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Very well-sourced list and it meets the criteria. --Carioca (talk) 20:52, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Carioca: thanks for the support. --Khadar Khani (talk) 22:13, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Good list but I think that a separate header for the references would be nicer.--FrankBoy _(Buzz) 21:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: thanks for the support. The references already have a separate header! --Khadar Khani (talk) 22:13, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Sahara4u I mean separate row and column.--FrankBoy _(Buzz) 22:14, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The list already has a lot of columns. Recently promoted lists of the fifers have the same patron, have a look at [2], [3] and [4]. --Khadar Khani (talk) 23:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm you're right. Anyway I withdraw my request. Please see this if you could give some kind of help. It will be appreciated.--FrankBoy _(Buzz) 10:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 19:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.