Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of games by Supermassive Games/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of games by Supermassive Games edit

Featured list candidates/List of games by Supermassive Games/archive1

Nominator(s): -- Zoo Blazer 06:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Supermassive Games is the company behind games such as Until Dawn, The Quarry, and The Dark Pictures Anthology. I figured it was time to change things up a little and nominate my first video game list for FLC. -- Zoo Blazer 06:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

"The studio published their first game, Big Match Striker in September 2010" => "The studio published their first game, Big Match Striker, in September 2010"
Done
"Supermassive worked on multiple games that utilized" - as it's a British company, that last word should be spelt "utilised"
Done
"both of which released in 2010" => "both of which were released in 2010"
Done
"In 2012, the studio partnered with BBC" => "In 2012, the studio partnered with the BBC"
Done
"BBC announced the decision" => "The BBC announced the decision"
Done
"However, another partnership game with BBC" => "However, another partnership game with the BBC"
Done
"releasing two spin-off titles; Until Dawn: Rush of Blood (2016) and The Inpatient (2018) for PlayStation VR, Sony's virtual reality headset" => "releasing two spin-off titles, Until Dawn: Rush of Blood (2016) and The Inpatient (2018), for PlayStation VR, Sony's virtual reality headset"
Done
"The first game, Man of Medan, released in August 2019" => "The first game, Man of Medan, was released in August 2019"
Done
"Supermassive released the standalone game, The Quarry in 2022" => "Supermassive released the standalone game The Quarry in 2022"
Done
Titles which begin with "The" should sort based on the next word in the title
Done
That's what I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:25, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Thanks for another great review. I think I fixed everything. -- Zoo Blazer 16:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14 edit

In addition to Chris's comments above

Pete served as CEO -- I think CEO needs to be written in full (lower case)
Done
BAFTA Award for Orginal Property -- perhaps it should specify that it is the BAFTA Games Award for Original Property (also typo on original)
Done and fixed
for PS VR - should be written in full (since you write second instances in full too, from what it looks like i.e. PlayStation 5, PlayStation 4), or if using acronyms, it should be consistent.
Changed it so only the first instances are written in full
Supermassive released PS5 -- same as above
See above
Initially the games -- comma after initially
Done
Ref(s) = Reference(s) in the table title
Isn't that what it shows? It says reference(s) when clicking on ref(s). Or are you talking about something else?

I made the edit - it says references instead of reference(s) (sorry for the nitpick)

That's all from me. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review: Passed

Dont use px sizes (use "upright=numeric value" instead)
Done
Images are appropriately licensed
Images are relevant
Images have alt text. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pseud 14: Thanks for the review! I addressed/commented on everything above. -- Zoo Blazer 17:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made a couple edits so it's quicker. Changes look good. Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 18:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14 Thanks for the support! For some reason I was reading the reference thing as already saying reference(s), which is why I was so confused. -- Zoo Blazer 18:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All good. Happens to the best of us! Pseud 14 (talk) 18:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question edit

Not a full review, just a question: I've done a lot of "video games by company" lists, so I'm familiar with the various formats used and have usually used wikitables for companies with more like 100 games (e.g. List of 3D Realms games) and templates like {{Video game titles}} for ones with more like 35 or less (e.g. List of id Software games). There's no set guideline, I'm just curious if it was a specific choice for this list or if you went with a wikitable by default. --Pres N 20:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PresN I edited the table that was at Supermassive Games and I think I just cleaned it up with a version of what is at List of games by Epic Games. I was already looking at the article since that was the one that helped me with naming this one. -- Zoo Blazer 21:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support by Chompy Ace edit

Support. Great job as a nearly flawless list! Also, If you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by TV Patrol regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 07:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review edit

Since this has substantial support and seems to be missing a source review, thought I'd strike this from the pending list. Version reviewed

Formatting

Fn 17 - Author last name should be Khan
Fn 41 - link Supermassive Games as you did with every instance.

Reliability

As far as I can tell, the sources in question seem to be professional and from well-circulated sites. At the same time, most of the sources I've found here were also largely used in your recent FA (The Dark Pictures Anthology: House of Ashes) which checks out the reliability and quality criteria. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

Fn 2 - ok
Fn 13 - ok
Fn 25 - ok
Fn 34 - ok
Fn 44 - ok
Fn 54 - ok
Fn 65 - ok

Great work overall, just a couple of formatting fixes. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pseud 14 Thanks for the source review and for catching those mistakes. Both have been fixed. -- Zoo Blazer 22:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That completes source review. Passed. Pseud 14 (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --Pres N 16:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.