Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of cricketers who have carried the bat in international cricket/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 12:53, 26 March 2015 [1].
List of cricketers who have carried the bat in international cricket edit
List of cricketers who have carried the bat in international cricket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
An interesting list. Given that we have only 10 cricketers performing this "feat" outside of Test cricket, I thought it's best to have all the three combined. Look forward to comments and suggestions. —Vensatry (ping) 16:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Only two queries:
- You might center the references in the table as they look much better than being on left.
- How about using {{Tooltip}} for more clarification for Ref? --FrankBoy (Buzz) 21:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- "Lords Cricket Ground" should be "Lord's Cricket Ground".
- I would prefer the "Name" column left aligned, but that is personal preference.
- The fixed column widths seem wrong, South Africa is across two lines on my screen when the home team.
- The runs column does not sort at all correctly for me, it needs a sortkey.
- The date is wrong for Test #6.
- Merge the last paragraph of the lead, which is only one sentence, into the previous paragraph. Harrias talk 17:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The first four sentences of the second paragraph are somewhat repetitive: "South African Bernard Tancred... when he made...", "England's Bobby Abel... when he made...", "Bill Woodfull of Australia... when he made...", "Australian Bill Brown... he made..."
- "Australia has performed this feat more than any other country.." I think this should be "Australian players have..."
- For some reason the column widths for the T20I table display differently than the two above, though it looks like they should all line up?
- Add "Inn." to the Key.
- I think it would be worth adding a note for each instance of not all 10 wickets being taken as to why that was.
- The South African flags need time correcting: prior to 31 May 1910, South Africa did not have a unified flag, so it probably isn't appropriate to use one at all. From 31 May 1928 you can use {{cr|SAF|1958}}, and from 27 April 1994 the current one. Harrias talk 16:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Quick drive-by comment......
- Is it worth putting something in to the effect that carrying the bat is far less likely to happen in ODIs and (especially) T20Is because it's much less likely that a team will lose all twn wickets.........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ~~~~ |
---|
Comments
That's it for me, fundamentally a very good list, which needs a few minor tweaks. Good work. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- I think you should incorporate "after all 10 wickets have fallen" into the first sentence. Because a limited-overs innings does indeed "end" at the end of 20/50 overs.
- I think you should mention that Bernard Tancred's 26* remains the lowest made while carrying the bat.
- Delink the cities under Venue; they aren't relevant here.
- Make sure the widths of the columns of all three tables are the same so it looks orderly.
- Have you found sources that illustrate the implications of what happens when a batsman carries his bat? For eg, it often means he is the lone knight standing while the rest of his team have performed poorly; this is borne out by the fact that in a majority of cases the team of the batsman carrying his bat loses. It'd be great if you could squeeze a couple of lines on this in the lead.—indopug (talk) 17:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support (once the cities are delinked, per above) A fine, well-sourced list.—indopug (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Well-written and well-sourced list, it meets the criteria.--Carioca (talk) 22:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Harrias, The Rambling Man, Indopug, and ChrisTheDude: Guys, requesting you to re-visit the nomination. —Vensatry (ping) 19:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.