Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Psych/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by SchroCat 18:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of awards and nominations received by Psych edit
List of awards and nominations received by Psych (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 23:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go again. I present to you: the awards and nominations for Psych, the poster child for a truly under-appreciated show. I really wish this list could be longer, but here it is. All 31 awards and nominations. Psych officially ends tomorrow (I suggest that everyone watch the finale), and I have been working hard to get this list improved before the end. I have sourced everything, and have information about each award, as it appears is standard among other featured lists of this type. I appreciate any comments you give. Thanks, - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 23:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support (having stumbled here from my FLC discussion page). Quite high level quality improvement effort by Awardgive. Most interesting that both List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit! and List of awards and nominations received by Psych include IIG Awards. Seems like both shows have helped educate viewers about science. :) Great job overall, — Cirt (talk) 21:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- In the infobox "Awards & Nominations", no need for capital N.
- Changed.
- If the "NAMIC Vision Awards" aren't notable enough for a Wikipedia article, why are they notable enough to be included in this list?
- Actually, I think that both the NAMIC awards and the organization itself are both notable enough for their own articles. Both have received more than decent media and literary coverage (example: This Business of Broadcasting).
- Don't think you need wikilinks in table captions.
- Removed links.
- "for favorite TV actor in a leading role" doesn't appear to have been, all four awards appear to be slightly different from one another.
- Reworded.
- "American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers" no comma after Authors.
- Removed comma.
- In image captions, I tend to see (pictured) as (pictured).
- Italicized.
- Imagen Awards and Imagen Foundation link to the same article, little point in linking them both in the same sentence.
- Unlinked Imagen Foundation.
- No real need for the Awkward screen grab. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:54, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Removed image.
I believe that I have addressed all of your concerns. Thanks for the review. - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 02:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - can't see any issues -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 12:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Cowlibob (talk) 13:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Good list that should satisfy FLC after you've made Crisco's amendments. Cowlibob (talk) 12:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Crisco 1492
- The show has been most recognized in terms of awards for its first episode, "Pilot"; its musical team; the series itself; and actor James Roday. - Well, if it's only received five awards, and you're naming four categories, that kind of makes "most recognized" pretty much useless, right?
- Removed "most".
- Try to curb the number of sentences starting with "the awards"
- It's down to at most one occurrence per section. Is this good enough?
- Double check to be sure that the series' title is in italics throughout the article
- I believe I have finished this.
- Double check to be sure that episode titles are in quotes throughout the article
- Same with above.
- Avoid using the present perfect if the show is not likely to get anymore awards ("has never...")
- I believe I have removed all instances of this.
- You don't really need "list of" in the table headers; it adds nothing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I have begun the fixes. I'll try to get the rest done in a day or so. Thanks, - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 06:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe I have addressed all of your remaining concerns, Crisco 1492. Thanks, - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 17:25, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, that looks to be it. Support. Good work. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:38, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 18:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.