Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Bruno Mars/archive1

List of awards and nominations received by Bruno Mars edit

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:37, 30 March 2014 (UTC) diff.[reply]

Nominator(s): MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I have worked really hard on this article to be a stand out above others. Besides this, I belive Bruno Mars and all his fans deserve this, despite so far having a short career the nominations and awards have been plenty regarding hsi music skills and achievements. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quick comments to get you up and running - a lot to do here.

Don't unnecessarily bold parts of the lead just to get a bold intro.
- Done. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Check WP:LEAD for length recommendations for this article.
- I believe the lenght of the article is now correct.MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ensure your numbers add up, the number of noms/awards in the lead isn't the same as the info box.
- Corrected now. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Check MOS:NUM and avoid mixing number formats, e.g. " received 8 nominations and won 2 award, one" should be " received eight nominations and won two awards, one"
- Corrected. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The intros to each award contain unreferenced material.
- Correct. All the intros have now. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is ASCAP really a "company"?
- No. It's a performing rights organizations (PRO), corrected now. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tables need to comply with MOS:DTT for row and col scopes.
- Can you explain to me what is wrong here? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Tables need row and col scopes. It helps screenreader users. Have a look at this edit. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:14, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done. Thanks for the example. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is it "pending" or "TBA"? Be consistent.
- All moved to pending MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ensure article complies with WP:DASH i.e. avoid spaced hyphens, use en-dash.
- Done. Should I put in refs too? Do the awards need too? For example: Producer of the year - non clssical? I can't put in "Doo-Wops & Hooligans" album because it won't redirect to the article.
Ensure date formats in references are consistent.
- Done. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Make sure works are in italics e.g. Daily Mail.
- Done. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Avoid SHOUTING in refs.
- Corrected. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Make sure refs are fully formatted, i.e. have publisher information, access and publication dates etc.
- Done. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest this is ~~withdrawn~~ until the fundamental issues noted are resolved. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man, do you still feel this should be withdrawn? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I have fixed the main issues just waiting for The Rambling Man to give his opinion towards the article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have struck suggestion to withdraw, but haven't got time to re-review yet, it looks improved however. Sorry I didn't get back here, it appears I didn't add it to my watch list. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (having stumbled here from my FLC discussion page). The list page looks much improved by MarioSoulTruthFan after implementing the suggestions by The Rambling Man, see changes since nomination at DIFF. I think I'll wait to review further until after reevaluation by The Rambling Man here. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 12:29, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delegate's note: this nomination was archived, but owing to issues with the bot closure appears to be taking longer than usual. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:07, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.