Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Inglourious Basterds/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 22:25, 29 April 2010 [1].

List of accolades received by Inglourious Basterds

Nominator(s): JuneGloom07 Talk? 11:33, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Inglourious Basterds/archive1

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe the article meets the Featured List criteria. This list was created to include the awards and nominations for the film Inglourious Basterds. This is my first featured article/list nomination and I look forward to your comments. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 11:33, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Jujutacular ^T · C 18:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

~~Check dablinks from toolbox on the right, there is 1~~
"Inglourious Basterds is 2009 war film..." Which war?
- Done (I wasn't sure if you wanted 'war' linked or replaced, so I've replaced it with 'World War II' for now.) - JuneGloom07 Talk? 17:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Discrepancy between the infobox dropdown and the main list for Broadcast Film Critics awards (3/10 vs 2/10)
- Fixed. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 17:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Another discrepancy for San Diego Film Critics awards.
- Fixed. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 17:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neither column in the infobox (Won and Nominated) add up to the totals listed, fix this after you resolve the discrepancies noted above.
- Fixed. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 17:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
IMDB is generally not considered a reliable source. Find a different source.
- Replaced. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 17:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's it from me for now. Good work overall! :) Jujutacular ^T · C 19:47, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Everything looks great to me now. Thanks! Jujutacular ^T · C 18:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support I had some issues, mainly concerning the referencing, but handled them myself last week. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 20:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 06:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments welcome to FLC, hope you continue to contribute more good lists!

Caption for image doesn't need a period.
62nd Cannes festival has a specific article at 2009 Cannes Film Festival.
"the film has grossed $320,351,773 worldwide," very very precise number which I'm sure will have changed since the information was released. Perhaps say "over 320 million" or similar?
"screenplay (Best Original Screenplay) to its direction and editing (Best Director, Best Editing) " not sure you need the "explanations" in parentheses.
Aha, you link to the actual Cannes festival later on. Just do it once.
"was entered for the" perhaps "submitted for consideration for the..."?
The White Ribbon should be in italics.
"Inglourious Basterds received eight Academy Awards nominations, the ceremony saw Waltz win for Best Supporting Actor" not a comma, perhaps a semicolon?
No spaced hyphens please (e.g. "Best Sound Editing - Sound Effects and Foley in a Feature Film")
Bullet point for external links.

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed all of the points. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 11:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support my comments addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Good work. Gage (talk) 05:17, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.