Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Blue Is the Warmest Colour/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 18:12, 17 November 2015 [1].

List of accolades received by Blue Is the Warmest Colour edit

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Blue Is the Warmest Colour/archive1

Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 10:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Is the Warmest Colour is a 2013 French romantic coming-of-age drama directed by Abdellatif Kechiche. It stars Adèle Exarchopoulos, and Léa Seydoux. This is a hopefully comprehensive run down of its accolades. As usual look forward to all the helpful comments on how to improve it. Cowlibob (talk) 10:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from GagaNutella^talk 19:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

;Comments by GagaNutella

Stars as a teenager -> stars a teenager.
The film premiered at the 66th Cannes Film Festival on 23 May 2013 where it received the Palme d'Or. -> The film premiered at the 66th Cannes Film Festival on May 23, 2013, where it received the Palme d'Or.
I don't think those "red links" are necessary.
Fix all the dates (mm dd yyyy), for example 17 December 2013 to December 17, 2013.
Add a "See also" section with 2013 in film.
Sources: use only work or publisher, not both a the same source. You don't need to say work=Variety publisher=Penske Media Corporation, simply work=Variety is enough. There are more cases. Oh, and remember, just use publisher when it doesn't need to be in italic.
Awards for Blue Is the Warmest Colour -> Accolades for Blue Is the Warmest Colour (External links). GagaNutella^talk 03:41, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GagaNutella: Thanks for the review. Have added see also, removed redlinks, changed to accolades. In regard to the other comments, the first comment is not grammatically correct. The sentence is about who she plays in the film, which is a teenager who falls in love with an older woman. The dates are day/month/year as this is a French not an American film so doesn't follow American convention of month/day/year in its dates. Having more information about references which include who publishes the work is encouraged on Wikipedia, having just the work or publisher is acceptable but not the only way that references should be. Cowlibob (talk) 13:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support I understood the date format, I just said that because this is an English Wikipedia, but you are right. About the references, even I'm supporting your FLC, I think you should give a chance and use only one of them (work or publisher). Anyway, this list looks amazing. Great job!!! GagaNutella^talk 15:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GagaNutella: Thanks. I have made the format uniform for all refs. It is the English Wikipedia but not the American English Wikipedia so date formats can vary per WP:ENGVAR.Cowlibob (talk) 20:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being so understanding and honest. That's amazing! GagaNutella^talk 00:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Birdienest81 (talk) 23:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

;Quick Comment

Shouldn't "Critics' Choice Awards" be referred to as Critics' Choice Movie Award since that's they name of the award as it appears on its article page. I understand that the Critics' Choice Television Award and the aforementioned film awards are planning to merge again for the 2016 ceremony as denoted here, but this award was referred to as "Critics' Choice Movie Awards" during 2014. Just curious.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 07:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Birdienest81: Thanks for pointing it out. Corrected name of the awards ceremony. Cowlibob (talk) 19:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Nice list. When you have the time, could you kindly proofread 60th Academy Awards for my latest FLC, please?

--Birdienest81 (talk) 23:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Maile

Image - Freely licensed on Commons and has an OTRS tag. Its use in the list is captioned and has W:ALT alternative text.
Sourcing - Those listed appear to be credible sources. Earwig's tool shows no issues of concern on copyvio or close paraphrasing.
List format - WP:DTT Table is well formatted with scope=row and scope=column, references centered within the column.

Support - — Maile (talk) 15:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Vivvt

Resolved comments from - Vivvt (Talk) 16:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Vivvt

For the first time, the jury at Cannes also presented the award to Kechiche, Exarchopoulos, and Seydoux. I know what you are trying to convey here but it doesnt come out well that actors are also awarded with the best film. Consider rephrasing.
Should you not be using {{sortname}} for names and {{sort}} for other entries? - Vivvt (Talk) 06:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivvt: Thanks for the review. Have rephrased the above sentence. I think you can use the sort template for anything. The sortname template is just easier to use for names. Cowlibob (talk) 19:22, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to add a note for three recipients because the official source here does not mention the actresses and also there is a rule defined here@Article 8 which mentions that "The Palme d'Or can never be awarded jointly". Still, jury superseded the rules.
I would prefer but not force you to use the templates wherever applicable for two reasons. Firstly, I had the similar doubts and got it cleared through the discussion held here. I think its cleaner way of representation for the editors as well. Secondly, I see the way you work on FLCs is being followed by a few other editors. I would really like if this practice gets followed to other lists through you. Again, just my thought. - Vivvt (Talk) 05:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivvt: Have converted all name entries into sortname. For the first point, normally the award is given to a film and the director normally collects it on behalf of the film as the recipient but that year the director and the two lead actresses were invited by the jury to collect the award on behalf of the film. The rule about joint awarding stops multiple films from winning the award not multiple people as two co-directors in the past have received the award for directing the same film together.Cowlibob (talk) 11:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. - Vivvt (Talk) 16:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support All of my comments have been resolved. - Vivvt (Talk) 16:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.