Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by 1917 (2019 film)/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by 1917 (2019 film) edit

List of accolades received by 1917 (2019 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Birdienest81 (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1917 is a 2019 war film directed and co-written by Sam Mendes. Inspired by stories told to the director by his grandfather, it chronicles the story of two young British soldiers (played by George MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman) in the spring of 1917 during World War I, who are given a mission to deliver a message warning of an ambush, soon after the German retreat to the Hindenburg Line during Operation Alberich. This is my first second film accolades list I am attempting to promote, and I largely based the format off of List of accolades received by The Artist (film) which was promoted in October 2015. I will gladly accept your comments to improve this list. Birdienest81 (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
;Comments
  • "Universal Pictures initially gave the film a limited release in eleven theaters" - it's a British film, so "theatres" should be spelt correctly the British way ;-)
    • (updated to add) Actually in Britain we don't refer to cinemas as theatres, so it might be best just to put "cinemas"..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • You should also use British date formats, so 10 January 2020, not January 10, 2020
  • Random aside: gosh, did this film only come out this January? I saw it at the cinema and it seems a lot longer ago, but I guess that's down to the crazy year we've all had.......
  • None of the notes are complete sentences, so they don't need full stops
  • Sorting order on the result column goes Won > Runner-up > Pending > Nominated > 21st > 11th, which seems very odd........?
  • Think that's genuinely all I could find to pick up on - great work overall! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
--Birdienest81 (talk) 23:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That La La Land one is a complete mess. It goes Won > Runner-up > Nominated > 10th > 9th > 8th > 7th > 6th > 5th > 4th > 3rd > 2nd, so 2nd ranks lower than 3rd. That doesn't seem to make any sense to me. In the case of the 1917 list, can you use a sorting template so that 11th at least ranks better than 21st? And "pending" should probably go at the bottom. That would fix this one...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I threw in a {{sort}} to fix this. Harrias talk 06:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review - Pass edit

Doing shortly Aza24 (talk) 20:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ref 16 and 17 both missing date and author
  • ref 26 missing retrieval date
  • A translated title for ref 26 would be nice as well "|trans-title="
  • ref 27 missing needs either publisher, website or work parameter
  • ref 32 missing date
  • ref 28 missing author and date
  • ref 34 missing author and date
  • ref 50 missing author and date
  • ref 51 missing author and date
  • ref 57 shouldn't be in all caps, it's a WP:MOS thing
  • ref 59 missing author
  • ref 60 missing author
  • Everything else looks good. Reliability is fine. Aza24 (talk) 22:16, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Aza24:: Fixed: I have fixed everything listed above. Thanks for the feedback
--Birdienest81 (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes everything looks good now. Pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 03:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I tried but I couldn't find anything. I remember seeing this last year — seems so long ago. )= ~ HAL333([2]) 20:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quick comment – This is a relatively minor issue, but according to MOS:LAYOUT, the one see also link should go before the notes. That is all I found. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:26, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done: I have switched the See Also and Notes sections accordingly.
--Birdienest81 (talk) 18:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Please add the date in sources 16, 17, 18
  • Fixed: There are now dates in all references.
  • Typo in source no. 25: Upoan > Upon
  • Fixed: Corrected misspelled word in title.
  • Source no. 26 Does not show about the winners and nominations. Please find another source.
  • Fixed: Replaced source with one showing winners.
  • Source no. 41: This source does not show the winners. Please find another source, or add another source with the winners.
    • If you are adding another source and keeping this, change the title of this source to: ‘Hollywood,’ ‘Marriage Story,’ top nominations for Houston film critics’ awards
  • Fixed: Added source from Houston Chronice that contains winners (might not appear if using incognito or private mode on browser).
    • Unable to review, as it says "article limit reached"
  • The source said "article limit reached" because of a paywall. That does not mean the source is unacceptable because someone else can verify the source as per Wikipedia:PAYWALL policy. It's like the same thing as a reference in a book. One may not have access to the actual book, but someone can go access it if they have it in a library. Nevertheless, I replaced the Houston Chronicle sources with ones from the actual ones from the Houston Film Critics Society. I checked for pop up advertisements and such, and there has been none so far. So I fixed it.
  • Yes, I know. I did not intend my comment to appear as an oppose. I just wanted to let you know I had been unable to review it. However, you did a good thing by replacing the Houston Chronicle sources with ones from the actual ones from the Houston Film Critics Society.
  • Source no. 69: This source does not show the winners. Please find another source, or add another source with the winners.
  • This source DOES SHOW the winners and nominees. If you keep scrolling down, there is a section that has the heading "THE 2019 WAFCA AWARD WINNERS" which contains the winners and another section that reads "The 2019 WAFCA AWARD NOMINEES WERE" wchich contains the nominees. Here is a screenshot of the winners section and another screenshot of the nominees section if you doubt me.
  • Add the author names in sources 64, 71
  • There is no author for ref 64 (now ref 65) since that website is not an article, but rather a webpage that just lists the winners. I went to the accolades page for Avengers: Endgame and the ref for the Seattle Film Critics Society contains no author. As for the last one I removed it because the reference before it already has an author and it sufficiently mentions the nomination along with its two nominated screenwriters.

Surge_Elec (talk) 18:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Surge elec: I have addressed all your comments. Thank you for your feedback.
--Birdienest81 (talk) 01:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Additional Comments
  • Test first - When I clicked on source no. 57, I was redirected to advertisements on the same tab. The first time, three such advertisements came then this source opened. The second time, two advertisements came and this source opened. Please consider finding another source.
  • Fixed: I initially got the same problem. So, I tried searching on Google for the OFCS website. I redid the entire citation reference. So it should work.
  • In the sources, link the publishers / companies, to their respective Wikipedia pages: The Hollywood Reporter, Entertainment Weekly, Deadline Hollywood, Variety (magazine), Houston Chronicle, IGN.
  • Fixed: Wikilinked all the periodical titles and websites in the resources.
@Surge elec: I responded to your latest comments. Thank you
--Birdienest81 (talk) 20:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You had missed three. I Wikilinked them. I made two more edits. And now, I am happy to support. Surge_Elec (talk) 21:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --PresN 15:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_accolades_received_by_1917_(2019_film)/archive1&oldid=988574950"