Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Square Enix Europe games/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC) [1].

---

List of Square Enix Europe games

List of Square Enix Europe games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of Square Enix Europe games/archive1

Nominator(s): PresN 21:39, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Square Enix Europe, Eidos-that-was, got bought by Japanese video game developer/publisher Square Enix back in 2009, and shortly thereafter merged with their European distribution wing into its present form. And since then it's... just continued on; they still run the development studios Eidos used to directly, they still publish the distinctly Western series instead of handing them off to Square Enix proper, and don't publisher the Japanese titles directly that SE handles. So, this summer Czar decided to break out their titles into a list of its own given their distinctive nature, Zntrip added some more work, and I finished it off to push it here. The format is set to match my prior FLs List of Square Enix video games and List of Square Enix mobile games, and everything should be good to go. So here it is: the 35 games published by Eidos after it stopped being its own independent entity. --PresN 21:39, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

• Support - I do love a good PresN list. Sumptuously sourced and representative of the quality that we've come to expect. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Cheetah (talk)

Comments This list includes games primarily published by Square Enix Europe. - Why primarily? How is it possible that Square Enix Europe games be published by someone else? The idea, I think, was to exclude games published by Square Enix regular where SEE was the European distributor: this role is commonly referred to as "the European publisher for game x" or "SEE published the game in Europe". I've reconsidered, though- it's not actually true- publishing is more than distributing- so I've removed "primarily". Tomb Raider the best-selling of Square Enix Europe's series, with lifetime sales of over 45 million copies since 1996. This is technically incorrect since Square Enix Europe was founded in 2009. Same with the Hitman sales. Reworked the sentences to note that they are popular series that have sold a lot without claiming those sales to SEE since a lot of them were before 20009. "List of video games" - "list of" is redundant Done. Row- and col- scopes are missing, I believe Whoops, that's embarrassing. Can you use the {{abbr}} template on "Ref(s)"? Done. Why the "Canceled games" are listed separately? They can be included in the main list and marked accordingly. Plus, the readers will have more info on them as well. They don't really fit in the table- a cancellation date is not the same thing as a release date, and doesn't tell you when they would have been released (also, one of the games has only "2012" as a cancellation date, as there was never a specific announcement as the game was never announced in the first place). I have expanded that section into a full table, though, since your "info" point was a good idea. It's ok to keep Notes and references in one section, I just was wondering if it's possible to use ";Note" and ";References" to separate that footnote. Done. --Cheetah (talk) 05:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC) @Crzycheetah: Responded to your points above. --PresN 17:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

• Support --Cheetah (talk) 17:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
• Support - Looks good! No issues, all games are reliably sourced. Great job as usual. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

• Source review –
  • There were a bunch of ref titles without en dashes. I fixed them for you, but be aware of this for the future.
  • Ref 49 looks to have a different citation template than the other sources. This should probably be made consistent with the others. Other than this issue and the one below, the reference formatting looked fine.
    • Fixed, it was missing the "web" in cite web.
  • Ref 102 doesn't have a listed publisher. While I'm here, does the video game project consider Hardcore Gamer a reliable source?
    • Cleaned up; and according to WP:VG/RS, yes.
  • Ref 117 is to Arohart, which sounds like some guy's personal website. Is Arthur Rohart a notable video game writer? If not, I'd have a difficult time considering this site reliable. The other sources appear reliable enough for the purpose.
    • Arthur Rohart was a level designer for the cancelled game in question, but I've replaced it with a Eurogamer ref anyway
  • Does "GO" need to be capitalized in refs 81 and 82?
    • Nope, fixed
  • I spot-checked refs 5, 15, 35, 63, 83, and 114, and found no verifiability concerns. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

@Giants2008: Fixed the problems; thanks! --PresN 16:32, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.