Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Avon

List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Avon edit

Renominating, as all of the issues are either fixed, or (in the case of US areas units) in the middle of being fixed (by User:Suicidalhamster - thanks for that). Old discussion is below. Any other issues we need to deal with? SP-KP 17:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Renata 04:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think all previous issues about area, units, references etc have been addressed and I'm now copying the format on List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Somerset. — Rod ^talk 14:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Question: is the grid reference a standard Ordnance Survey thing? You may want to clarify that. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 13:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does seem to be the standard way of doing grid references. I've added a note about it and this reference. Does this help explain the issue? - Suicidalhamster 14:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it does. Support. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 14:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Can we give some thought to whether the non-auto numbering of map links is the correct thing to do? I've just added in a missing site which I found out about while starting to work on the Gloucs list (EN's website, our source, has it in the wrong AoS). Because each map is given a specific numbered label I had to go through and renumber lots of entries. Is there a better method? SP-KP 15:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think i'm responsible for that! I did it so that the links appeared without brackets, so as not confuse inline citations with external map links, when you look at the article. I realise now that this makes it harder to add new sites (however this is unlikely to be a common occurrence). I'm not fussed which style is used. - Suicidalhamster 18:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it's not a big issue - new SSSI notifications have slowed to a snails pace. This shouldn't stand in the way of FL status for this article. SP-KP 12:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I believe all previous issues have been dealt with. (although I have edited this article a fair bit since the previous nomination.) - Suicidalhamster 11:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]