Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Philadelphia Flyers players/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 21:58, 6 April 2010 [1].
List of Philadelphia Flyers players (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Nominator(s): Harrias (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets all the FL criteria. It is based on existing ice hockey player lists, but I have added sortability to the tables. Unfortunately, due to the nature of this, the addition of SortKeys has made the article a lot larger and slightly slow to load, which is unfortunate. Harrias (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Anthony (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments:
Overall a good list, just missing a few things that are included in other lists. Fix these issues and I'll gladly support. Anthony (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support - all comments have been addressed, and list is up to FL standards. Anthony (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 18:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comment – What makes the following sources reliable?
|
Support – Looks good to go. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 18:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NMajdan |
---|
|
- When you have a player with multiple season ranges, shouldn't the ranges be separated by a comma?
- Blank cells should use an em dash instead of a regular hyphen.
- I disagree, many tables use en dashes as I have done here, and there is nothing that I can see in WP:MOSDASH stating that either should be preferred.
- I'd prefer the numerical columns (Seasons through Playoffs SV%) to be center aligned, but that's just personal preference. I won't withhold supporting the list because of this.
- I'll leave it as it is for the moment, and see if anybody else comments on it. I'm willing to change it, but it'll be arduous, so I don't want to do it and then have three people say they prefer it as is!
—NMajdan•talk 18:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your comments, I have made most changes as suggested, but commented on a couple of them. Harrias talk 20:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. My most pressing concerns have been addressed. There are still a few outstanding items, but nothing large enough to prevent my support. I've left those issues uncapped for other reviewers to comment on if needed.—NMajdan•talk 13:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.