Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Oklahoma Sooners in the NFL Draft/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 22:44, 17 November 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): —NMajdan•talk 16:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
I have created this list based on the current FL List of Arkansas Razorbacks in the NFL Draft. I used several sources for the NFL Draft listing data including Pro-Football-Reference.com and the official University of Oklahoma website. However, I made considerable effort to find original sources for Pro Bowl and NFL Championship listings. I believe this list meets all the criteria for a featured list.—NMajdan•talk 16:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support from KV5 (Talk • Phils) 01:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
Just a few quick things:
Hope these comments help. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 18:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Each NFL franchise seeks to add new players through the annual NFL Draft. The team with the worst record the previous year |
- Dabs; please check the disambiguation links identified in the toolbox. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:04, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please see my comment above.—NMajdan•talk 11:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- You'd have to duplicate the reference for each draftee from that particular year. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 19:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What about making a third header in the References (along with Generic and Specific) for the yearly links to the pro-football-reference website?—NMajdan•talk 19:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That probably won't fly, but the information is all verified by the current general references, so you probably don't absolutely have to have the references in the table. You could also include this as additional support if you like. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 19:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have dropped the references column. Will work on the other changes to make this list sortable over the coming days.—NMajdan•talk 20:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That probably won't fly, but the information is all verified by the current general references, so you probably don't absolutely have to have the references in the table. You could also include this as additional support if you like. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 19:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What about making a third header in the References (along with Generic and Specific) for the yearly links to the pro-football-reference website?—NMajdan•talk 19:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You'd have to duplicate the reference for each draftee from that particular year. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 19:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Why not make it sortable? -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 20:35, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree, no reason not to make this list sortable.—Chris!c/t 04:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What's the status on this? Dabomb87 (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Umm...look up.—NMajdan•talk 01:35, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, sorry about that. I'm pressed for time, and was just quickly glancing at each FLC. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Umm...look up.—NMajdan•talk 01:35, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What's the status on this? Dabomb87 (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The list is now sortable with the exception of the Player name column. That will be sortable as soon as I add {{sortname}} to the 300+ names.—NMajdan•talk 15:18, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Player name column now sortable.—NMajdan•talk 16:35, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dabs; please check the disambiguation links identified in the toolbox. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the notes are not referenced—Chris!c/t 00:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The notes are just specifying more detail than what is in the table and thus covered why the same references that the table has which are the general references.—NMajdan•talk 03:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, I support.—Chris!c/t 03:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The notes are just specifying more detail than what is in the table and thus covered why the same references that the table has which are the general references.—NMajdan•talk 03:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
One more comment before I support: should the 2010 Draft, which won't occur until next April, be included this soon? Most sports FLs I've seen don't include future events, at least not while they are at FLC. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I'll remove it. I liked it better when the list was unsortable. I don't like it as much now.—NMajdan•talk 00:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – My comments have all been addressed and the list meets FL criteria. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 17:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.