Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of New England Patriots head coaches
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 23:06, 26 May 2008 [1].
previous FLC (20:12, 11 May 2008) Self-nomination Well written lead, and well referenced table. Seems readt for FL. « Milk's Favorite Cookie ( talk / contribs) 19:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support (as nom) « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie ( talk / contribs) 21:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Why the re-nomaination so soon after the first failed? And what is with the arrogant nomination statement of the well written lead when you yourself wrote it? Qst (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm renominating it because the first nomination simply failed because of "lack of comments" « Milk's Favorite Cookie ( talk / contribs) 19:26, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Qst, he's just trying to highlight why he thinks it meets the FL criteria. There's no penalty against stroking your ego once in a while. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Further: I actually didn't write the lead; Jayron32 rewrote it. « Milk's Favorite Cookie ( talk / contribs) 21:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, no probs - I was just curious. Qst (talk) 15:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Further: I actually didn't write the lead; Jayron32 rewrote it. « Milk's Favorite Cookie ( talk / contribs) 21:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Qst, he's just trying to highlight why he thinks it meets the FL criteria. There's no penalty against stroking your ego once in a while. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- I think if you refer to a person once, you only need to refer to them by their last name after that (i.e when you mention Holovak, Berry, Parcells, etc. again).
- John Mazur should be wikilinked at first mention.
- Mazur's incident should be referenced.
- "When the team qualified for the playoffs, Fairbanks was reinstated. He lost the first playoff game, his last for the Patriots." Perhaps these two sentences could be combined?
- Instead of saying "statistics cover through...", try "statistics are through".
- Why do you need both a color and an asterisk to indicate a Hall of Fame coach?
Noble Story (talk) 09:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- ( Done with everything except there should be both an asterisk (*) and the color per WP:COLORS. « Milk's Favorite Cookie ( talk / contribs) 21:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
More comments from Noble Story
- The reference you provide for Mazur being fired does not name Mazur at all in the article.
- Perhaps the last sentence in the lead about the stats could be made into a note? Or, do you really need a note saying it's a current total? It would be presumed the list is up-to-date.
Noble Story (talk) 06:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed Mazur reference, and updated his and Bengston's numbers. Databasefootball's numbers must be wrong, since BOTH of the references mention that Mazur had resigned with 5 games left to go in the season, and not 1.
- The last sentance seems germaine since the reader should know when the stats apply for. Especially once the season starts, such a reference is likely to be important. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 12:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove italics from publishers in references that are not periodicals.
- Can something be done with paragraphs in the lead that consist of a single sentence?
Gary King (talk) 00:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There is only one one-sentence paragraphs, and it is fine the way it is. It is a completely different idea from the last, which warrents a new para. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks good to me now. However, one quibble: Perhaps the last sentence of the lead could go down as a note at the end of the table (like so). Noble Story (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good work, no major issues. As always, a copyedit wouldn't hurt, but the prose is generally good. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.