Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of NHL players with 50-goal seasons/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 19:27, 17 April 2010 [1].
List of NHL players with 50-goal seasons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Nominator(s): Resolute 01:04, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
Nominating for several reasons: 50 goals is one of the NHL's most celebrated achievements, I'm looking to set a standard for related lists and for the WikiCup. The list has been stable, it is now well referenced, complete and has plenty of images. Resolute 01:04, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - boldface shouldn't be used as an indicator —Chris!c/t 01:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I was not aware of that. Changing now. Resolute 01:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I suppose current players can be indicated with a highlight and a '*', as discussed at WikiProject hockey. Also, the "Games played" and "goals" key could probably be done in {{abbr}} to make them tooltip, like I've seen used in other hockey articles. eg. GP Schmloof (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed, done. Resolute 17:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Shouldn't this be at List of 50-goal seasons in the National Hockey League or List of 50-goal NHL seasons or something like that? This isn't a list of players (right off the bat Hull appears several times), this is a list of seasons. Staxringold talkcontribs 21:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Semantics, imo. It is still a list of players, but some players have multiple entries. Resolute 16:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- How is it semantics? List of Major League Baseball players with a career .400 on-base percentage is a players list, it's about the players. This is a seasons list, the player is just a descriptor for that season. This is List of Major League Baseball home run champions. Staxringold talkcontribs 20:41, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This list is still about the players. Players with multiple seasons that fit the criteria will receive multiple entries, however. Resolute 01:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Support--Truco 503 17:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
"50-goal seasons were relatively common...". Don't believe sentences should start with numbers like this.Don't need two 50 goals in 50 games links in the main section.Giants2008 (27 and counting) 23:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ack! Someone snuck that second link in right under my nose... Both should be fixed, give or take a dash, since I have no clue if it should be there or not when joining two words. Resolute 02:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Meets FL standards. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 20:06, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Perhaps the number of times a player reached the milestone should be given it's own column, then one would be able to quickly find out which players scored 50 in a certain amount of seasons. Also, would it be possible to add some kind of indicator of which players led the league in goals scored to the table? Yes, one can figure that out already, but some kind of indicator would help. If not, I think the Maurice "Rocket" Richard Trophy should be mentioned somewhere in the history section. Otherwise, great work. -- Scorpion0422 21:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I had thought about highlighting league leaders, but decided that that effectively duplicates content at the Richard Trophy article. I wonder if other reviewers have an opinion on that? Certainly open to adding it. Putting number of times reached could be moved to a separate column, but would having a sort that basically goes Bossy (9), Gretzky (9), Bossy (8), Gretzky (8), Bossy (7), Gretzky (7), etc add any benefit? I'll have to contemplate how to discuss the Richard trophy... but will be when I have more time. For now, I've just thrown it into a see-also section, since it does have considerable relevance to the topic. Resolute 21:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, I am not a big fan of using multiple different highlights for different tidbits. imo, highlighting active players is of greater relevance than highlighting league leaders, especially since not every season has a leader >50. Resolute 21:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 16:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support my comments dealt with. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.