Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Major League Baseball players with a career .400 on-base percentage/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 23:16, 12 February 2010 [1].
- Nominator(s): Staxringold talkcontribs 05:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it is up to FLC snuff, covering an interesting and classic benchmark group of great hitters. The traditional "slash stats" are a .300/.400/.500 hitter that is someone with a .300 batting average, .400 on-base percentage, and a .500 slugging percentage. I think it'll be nice to have at least the basic baseball statistics lists in better order as some of them were pretty shabby looking (this list, for example, had only one sentence of prose prior to my expansion). Also, sidenote, but I can't figure out why the equivalent batting average list is .325, despite what I've said above. This is at .400, slugging is at .500, and on-base plus slugging is at .900, but I guess for simplicity (208 players have a .300 career average) we went with a higher mark. Unrelated to this list, though. Staxringold talkcontribs 05:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
Well done. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 12:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
Support from KV5 (Talk • Phils) 15:15, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments - once again, I'm squeezing this tight, barely anything to moan about...
|
- Very Minor Issue - I don't know if this has been brought up before, but may I ask why the space template ({{-}}) is after the table, is it really needed? Afro (Not a Terrible Joke) - Afkatk 09:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
-
- Support - Everything looks good. Afro (Its More Than a Feeling) - Afkatk 19:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Provisionalsupport –Only real issue I see is a number starting a sentence: "26 of the 42 eligible players with a career on-base percentage of .400 or higher have been elected to the Hall of Fame."Other than that, everything looks good. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 20:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you prefer "Of the 42 eligible players... 26 have been elected"? Staxringold talkcontribs 20:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. That looks good. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, found something to link and did that, but otherwise the list is good. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.