Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Local Nature Reserves in Essex/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Local Nature Reserves in Essex edit

List of Local Nature Reserves in Essex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This list is in the same format as other featured lists of Local Nature Reserves, such as Hertfordshire and Buckinghamshire, and I hope it will also be found to meet the criteria. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Not sure why Essex is emboldened at the start of the lead.
  • Convert the area into sq km or hectares or something appropriately metric.
  • Isn't Southend on Sea hyphenated?
  • "0.5 hectares" metric this time? Suggest consistent Imperial (metric) or the other way round.
  • " 75% of these are hornbeam..." shouldn't start sentences with numbers...
  • "The 8.5 long " missing a unit (and a conversion).
  • Any good reason that Pale Flax is capitalised thus?

That's about it this time round. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. I'll cap and support in due course, just interested to see what other reviewers have to say... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support lavishly illustrated, well-cited, all problems identified above fixed LavaBaron (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Why are we converting kilometer to miles? The subject is not American nor is this encyclopedia.
    Brits use miles. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am not sure if you need the initials under Keys to be bold.
  • They are in bold in other similar lists and I think it is better to be consistent.
  • The beginning of the description of the sites are quite repetitive. Most of them either begin with "This (site)" or "The (site)". I would rearrange.
  • I have amended to give more variety to the beginnings. Does it look OK now FrB.TG? Dudley Miles (talk) 15:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's certainly better now.
  • Why are the YES (under public access) in capital?
  • I think you might need to wiki-link the publishers in references (or not). It is up to you.
  • I have never (or very rarely) wiki-linked publishers and I do not think it is usual. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is it. – FrB.TG (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC) PS if it is not too much to ask, could you perhaps consider posting at FLC for listings of Bradley Cooper's films?[reply]

Support FrB.TG (talk) 15:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed- not linking publishers is unusual, but is not against any rules as long as you're consistent. Promoting. --PresN 17:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_Local_Nature_Reserves_in_Essex/archive1&oldid=753749856"