Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Knight's Cross recipients of the Schnellboot service
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 20:31, 29 November 2008 [1].
The article lists all sailors and officers that received the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross during World War II. I think this meets all the criteria of a featured list article.MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:06, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC) [reply]Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
- "The Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross (German: Ritterkreuz des Eisernen Kreuzes) and its variants was the highest award in the military of the Third Reich." "was"-->were. done
- "During World War II, 23 German sailors and officers of the Schnellboot (Fast Attack Craft) service as part of the Kriegsmarine received the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross." I think "as part of" should be "which was a part of" and enclosed in commas. done
- "Among them, 8 officers received the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves (Ritterkreuz des Eisernen Kreuzes mit Eichenlaub)." "Among them"-->Of them or Of these. done
- "a higher grade, the Oak Leaves to Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross was instituted." Comma after "Iron Cross". done
- "At the end of 1944
the last andfinal grade," done - "based on the enactment Reichsgesetzblatt 1945 I S. 11 of 29 December 1944 concluded the variants of the Knight's Cross." Comma after 1944. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC) done[reply]
- All comments addressed MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - another well constructed and interesting list on Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 22:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I assume that all the info comes from the general sources, but the personal info should be cited. Especially the one accusing of a crime (suicide) which contravenes WP:BLP, but prefereaby all the notes.Yobmod (talk) 10:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, that was a very similar featured article (i clicked a link, but it looked like the same page)- how did that pass while breaking policy?Yobmod (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Q: Why does this article exist, if a more comprehensive article with ALL awardees is already featured?Yobmod (talk) 10:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A: It isn't unheard of. Woody's done something similar with the Victoria-Cross pages, splitting them according to nationalities, service-branches, and wars. Cam (Chat) 06:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, I have. You cannot get this list of recipients from the main article. They list different things, they are separate areas of study. The main list shows all the recipients, by which grade they received. I can see the point about duplication with List of Knight's Cross recipients of the Kriegsmarine. Indeed, wasn't the Schnellboot service part of the Kriegsmarine, so all information in this list is included in the Kriegsmarine list? Are there any specific reasons for duplication? Woody (talk) 15:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- My main motivation for breaking these recipients out is that two groups stand out when looking at the KC recipients of the Kriegsmarine. The first and largest group were those men that served on German U-boats (see List of Knight's Cross recipients of the U-boat service). The second but smaller group came from the Schnellboot service. Together they comprised roughly 55% of all the Kriegsmarine recipients. The remaining 45% are a mixed bunch of people, some came from destroyers, auxiliary cruisers, battleships, Naval infantry, etc. MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.