Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Green Bay Packers Associated Press All-Pro selections/archive1

List of Green Bay Packers Associated Press All-Pro selections (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Nominator(s): « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a new list for FLC: List of Green Bay Packers Associated Press All-Pro selections! This list follows the same format as List of Green Bay Packers Pro Bowl selections. As always, happy to resolve any issues in a timely fashion. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit
  • "The All-Pro recognition is more prestigious" - suggest "The All-Pro recognition is considered more prestigious"
  • "The AP All-Pro Team includes a first-team and second-team" - don't need those hyphens
  • "Pro Football Hall of Famer Don Hutson in in 1940" - two things here. Firstly, he wasn't a Hall of Famer in 1940, secondly the word "in" is repeated
  • "The most recent AP All-Pro selection for the Packers was kick returner Keisean Nixon for 2023 AP All-Pro Team" => "The most recent AP All-Pro selection for the Packers was kick returner Keisean Nixon for the 2023 AP All-Pro Team"
  • "Don Hutson's six AP All-Pro selections were all on the first-team." - lose the hyphen again
  • Note a: "The position which the player was selected as an All-Pro." => "The position for which the player was selected as an All-Pro."
  • That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you ChrisTheDude, I think I have addressed all your comments here. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

edit

Source review: Passed

  • Reliable enough for the information being cited
  • Consistent date formatting
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable (note that Gonzo follows a different format, which I am trying to adhere to, as opposed to my standard format)
  • Spot checks on 15 sources match what they are being cited for

Feedback:

  • Various news agencies identified All-Pro teams dating back to... – Should we consider something like "selected" as opposed to identified? It also contextually may make more sense.
  • This isn't a hard line for me, but I believe, in regards to ref 14, AP News would be a more appropriate link. I recognize Associated Press News is appropriate, but it was my understanding that that sect of the AP typically goes by "AP News".

That's all I've got. Good stuff! Please do ping me when you reply. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Hey man im josh! I made the necessary changes. I must have copied that AP link from somewhere else, since it didn't really match my typical reference formatting. I changed it to website = APNews.com. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]