Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Grade I listed buildings in Mendip/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 22:39, 27 June 2009 [1].
List of Grade I listed buildings in Mendip edit
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating List of Grade I listed buildings in Mendip for featured list because I feel it meets all the criteria, is well supported by references to reliable sources and has a selection of suitable images to illustrate the sorts of buildings included. It follows the structure of the recently promoted List of Grade I listed buildings in Sedgemoor. — Rod talk 21:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What makes [2] reliable?
- Cathedrals Plus is run by the "Pilgrim's Association". Membership of the Association includes almost all the Church of England cathedrals, three Anglican cathedrals in Wales and three in Ireland, three of the Metropolitical Roman Catholic cathedrals, the Methodist Central Hall and Wesley’s Chapel together with several Abbeys and major churches. It is governed by a Council of fifteen members elected for a three-year term on a rotational basis at the Annual General Meeting. It is a registered charity with the Council Members acting as trustees and is responsible to the Charity Commission for the proper conduct of its affairs. (see About the Pilgrims Association)
Likewise http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/h8-glastonbury.html?Dabomb87 (talk) 01:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This comes from the Internet Medieval Sourcebook in which Paul Halsall has collected together a range of relevant letters and texts into an accessible format, in which he cites all the original sources used. It is hosted by the Fordham University Center for Medieval Studies of Fordham University in New York. See [3] for information about the sourcebook, its editor, the sources used and selection process.
- If these are not seen as being reliable I will look for another reference to back up the claims.— Rod talk 16:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Hassocks5489
|
---|
*Comments from Hassocks5489*
Lead:
Picture captions:
Table:
Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 16:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
Support – all comments addressed. I agree with your rationale for the two sources queried by Dabomb, so I can add my support. By the way, I corrected a damaged wikilink by adding "]]". Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 22:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support very good indeed, just one thing - not keen on the placement of ref 12 - shouldn't it be following punctuation where possible? The Rambling Man (talk) 10:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.