Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Cricket World Cup records/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 14 days, 4 support, 0 oppose. Promote. --Kalyan 04:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Nominating the article as it has covered a lot of ground. The main concern is that some records don't have the WC year reference when the record was established. Thus, we see Lowest winning margin (runs) have two entries of "Australia v India" - 1 run, one from 1987 WC and one from 1992 WC. I shall correct the same over the next few days. Kalyan 07:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, at least there's some substances and several references for this one. -- Phoenix2 (holla) 04:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Conditionalsupport- Remove the redundant table-wide headers. They merely repeat what is just said by the artice headers.
- Either use flags consistently across the list, or don't use them at all (that's the "Team Overall" table I'm referring to).
- Circeus 19:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Your references are not consistent. Either use {{cite web}} for all references or do not use at all. Plus, several refs are missing access-dates, publisher.--Crzycheetah 07:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Addressed your comment. Please let me know if there are any other comments. --Kalyan 08:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Conditionalsupport The article looks fine. The only problem is that there is only one source. Could you add some other sources?...other than Cricinfo. I know that most of the info in this list is about stats, but I think it would be better if this list had another source. It's possible that Cricinfo may have typos on their webssite, so it would be great to actually check that.--Crzycheetah 17:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]- I can try and use cricketarchive.com but cricinfo is the most utilized site for cricket information. It is independent (or was, till it was acquired by ESPN a couple of weeks ago!) and is generally relied for most of cricket stats, articles, pics and everything. Also, i am not too familiar with cricketarchive.com and have been using cricinfo.com for more than 5 years now. --Kalyan 19:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]