Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Blackhawks captains/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 21:39, 6 April 2009 [1].
| Toolbox |
|---|
I made this one all pretty, too. Teemu08 (talk) 19:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why can't this article simply be a subsection in List of Chicago Blackhawks players? Dabomb87 (talk) 22:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with Dabomb87.—Chris! ct 23:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed, a very forky topic.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 00:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 111kb isn't long enough? Teemu08 (talk) 03:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you seen the proposed new FL criteria? Basically, just because a list can be split off doesn't mean it should be. See User:Scorpion0422/FL_audit#Ice_hockey, in which a current FL captains list could potentially be delisted and merged. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hm, didn't know that it had come so far along. Well, if the new criteria are accepted, I'll withdraw the nomination and merge the articles. Teemu08 (talk) 21:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you seen the proposed new FL criteria? Basically, just because a list can be split off doesn't mean it should be. See User:Scorpion0422/FL_audit#Ice_hockey, in which a current FL captains list could potentially be delisted and merged. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 111kb isn't long enough? Teemu08 (talk) 03:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed, a very forky topic.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 00:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment List of Chicago Blackhawks players is an enormous article, so I think a split may be justified. A more logical place to merge might be List of Chicago Blackhawks award winners. -- Scorpion0422 18:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why can't the captains just be denoted in the main roster list?--Best, ₮RUCӨ 20:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Concur, you can easily indicate that by adding symbol and color.—Chris! ct 02:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Exactly.--Best, TRUCO 00:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Concur, you can easily indicate that by adding symbol and color.—Chris! ct 02:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, 3b. Excellent list, but there is no reason to have it for reasons I've explained above and at the players' list's FLC. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per 3b, can easily merge with List of Chicago Blackhawks players—Chris! ct 18:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - 3b. Captains can easily be highlighted in the team's list of players. Giants2008 (17-14) 23:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw now that the criteria has been changed. Teemu08 (talk) 14:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.