Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Bleach video games/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 14:33, 24 October 2009 [1].

List of Bleach video games

Nominator(s): Lightlowemon (talk) 05:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I have worked on it for the past month, and a peer review has been completed where all issues were addressed and taken care of. I have compared it to other lists of similar nature and have completed it to the best of my ability, it is currently completely up-to-date. I feel it now meets all necessary criteria. Lightlowemon (talk) 05:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Ok just some comments regarding a few issues, i didnt read the lead or check the sources so i wont give my support to the article has been fully covered.

Missing a references:
- on the lead sentence in all the sections of the list
- on the fourth note of Bleach: The Blade of Fate
- 3rd note for Bleach: Dark Souls
- 3rd note for Bleach: Heat the Soul 6
- on 2nd note for Jump Super Stars
- on 2nd note for Jump Ultimate Stars

Done one and four, removed three, do original names really need sourcing, and I did not reference the last two per the example in the One Piece video game list.--Lightlowemon (talk) 09:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could there be something to add to the notes section of Bleach: Soul Carnival 2

Something added--Lightlowemon (talk) 09:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is multiple references for a single release date nessacary. surely if they all show the same date and are all reliable then one is sufficient

Whilst I agree, I used, as a template, the One Piece article, so I made sure to insert multiple sources, it can be easily changed though.--Lightlowemon (talk) 09:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same would go for the system release. One reference would be enough to tell us that it was released in 2005 on the Nintendo DS for example.

See above--Lightlowemon (talk) 09:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the maximum width for a non-free thumbed image is 300px and therefore the logo should be reduced in the article. A smaller version should also be uploaded to better comply with fair use.Salavat (talk) 15:48, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I shall shrink it down in the article, but the actual logo was originally uploaded by a prominent user, so should I shrink it down still? --Lightlowemon (talk) 09:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh you should reupload it maybe at a width of 300px, disregard the fact that the uploader is a prominent use, IMO it seems a little large. I still think those last two notes above should have a source and that some of the referencing is a bit excessive but i guess leave it up to the other reviewers to voice their opinions as its only a minor issue. Salavat (talk) 17:21, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've shrunk to 300 x 70 and I shall wait for the response of others for the sourcing, as I counted those numbers myself, there was no official source that stated outside of "various levels and stages". --Lightlowemon (talk) 07:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "Reception toward the games has been mixed, ranging from "the best fighter"[3] to "(not) a bad first effort, but the competition is leaving this one in the dust."" Can you mention the games the quotes are referring to? Dabomb87 (talk) 23:36, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the lead edits, as well as the release date update, I missed that, I've added in the games the quotes are referring to and moved the references to the end. --Lightlowemon (talk) 01:58, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.