Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Latin Grammy Trustees Award/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Latin Grammy Trustees Award edit

Featured list candidates/Latin Grammy Trustees Award/archive1

Nominator(s): Erick (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With my FLC for Billboard Latin Music Hall of Fame gaining enough supports, I am now nominating this article for FL. Continuing on with my FLC for Latin music, this list is different in that the accolade is for the behind the scenes guys (producers, engineers, etc.). This FLC is based on the Latin Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award which I got FL two years ago. I look forward to your comments. Erick (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV

Lead's first sentence needs a ref
"Since 2005, the Trustees Awards has been presented to more than recipients" – more than what?
Lead should honestly be a little longer. The second "paragraph" only has one sentence
Link every country mentioned in the lead
Table needs scope cols (you have scope rows but not cols)
Link Billboard in ref 1
Add author to ref 2
Check out and fix these refs

That's all I got. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 02:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BeatlesLedTV: Thanks for the comments. How does it look now? Erick (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah looks better. Also make sure the link to the awards ceremonies aren't redirects. Right now they are all "Latin Grammys of xxxx" instead of "xx Annual Latin Grammy Awards". BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BeatlesLedTV: Done. Erick (talk) 20:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Looks good to me. Great job on this! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Aoba47

For this sentence (This can include producers, songwriters, composers, record label executives, and journalists.), I would avoid using “This” in this format”. Maybe something like: “It can be award to…) or (Recepients can include…) to avoid this use of “this”.
For this part (a string of galas just prior to the annual Latin Grammy Awards ceremony.), I do not think that “just” is needed as “prior” works on its own and conveys the same meaning in my opinion.
I am not sure about the lead’s second paragraph. It seems like it could be combined with the first paragraph.
The last sentence of the first paragraph and the first and second sentences of the second paragraph have the same sentence construction (i.e. the “presented” verbage). I would revise to avoid the repetition of this word if possible.
I was a little confused by the notability of this sentence (Pierre Cossette was also the recipient of the Grammy Trustees Award in 1995.). Is he the only person to ever receive both? If so, then please clarify this. It seems rather out-of-place in the lead without the full context.
You link the countries in the lead, but not in the table. Just wanted to raise this to your attention.
According to the infobox, the award as last given in 2017. The lead does not mention that the award is no longer given or why it was discontinued. Can you please address this in the lead?

Wonderful work with this list. Once my comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to support this for promotion. If possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide some comments on my current FAC (Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/All Money Is Legal/archive1). Either way, good luck with this, and have a great start of your week. Aoba47 (talk) 22:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: I believe I have addressed your issues. The last awarded is just the last time they gave the award. It hasn't been discontinued. Erick (talk) 21:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing everything. I have removed the "last awarded" part from the infobox as it implies that it was discontinued. I would add to the infobox the current recipient of the award to the infobox (see these two articles for what I mean Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress and Academy Award for Best Actress). I will support this once this comment is addressed. Aoba47 (talk) 22:02, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Thanks for the comments. I have fixed the issues you brought up. Erick (talk) 17:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I support this for promotion. Great job with this! Aoba47 (talk) 17:43, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Yashthepunisher

The country names should be delinked per WP:OLINK.
"Latin Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences" in the general reference is piped to a redirect.
You can mention the total number of times the award has been given, in the infobox.

Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yashthepunisher: Addressed everything but the last point. I don't see a parameter on the template for the number of times it has been awarded. Erick (talk) 04:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can take a clue from here. Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:52, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yashthepunisher: I've added the number of times awarded. Erick (talk) 16:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support this nomination. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:55, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --Pres N 15:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.