Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Lady Byng Memorial Trophy

Lady Byng Memorial Trophy edit

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 4 support, 0 oppose. Yes, it's a self-promotion, but after 10 days there is no opposition, so I do not feel that there is any sort of conflict of interest. Promote. Scorpion⁰⁴²² 16:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page is modelled after the Hart Memorial Trophy, which is a recently listed FL. The page is fully referenced. Any concerns that are brought up will be addressed. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 02:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Comments[reply]

This is very nitpicky, but the images near the list drop off in the middle. Would it be possible to add more of them?
Otherwise, I'm extremely pleased, and it already meets all the FLC criteria. Congratulations! Maxim 12:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I would love to, but I have added all of the free images of the players that Wikipedia has to offer... I even added one of a guy holding a completely different trophy. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 14:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - What about increasing size to 200 px, for example?
    - It could be done, but the one image is less than 100px and won't get any bigger, so it would look weird. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 14:55, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - Then I think I should Support the FLC. I know I being overly nitpicky :D Maxim_(talk) 14:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but I agree with the image issue, though this may be different at different sizes and such. Perhaps you could put line breaks in after each image, or within the thumbed section of the image? Anyway, therwise, a comprehensive, well written and presented page. Worthy of FL. linca ^linca 00:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OpposeLead lacks useful statistics found in other similar lists (e.g. how many different players). The final sentence is also of dubious relevance. Circeus 19:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll add the players, but which final sentence are you talking about? The final sentence in the lead or the final in the history section? Because in both cases, it mimics content from Hart Memorial Trophy, which is an FL. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 19:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - But this is not strictly a MVP trophy, so the sentence is misleading. Circeus 20:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - You are correct, and I have fixed the problem (I think). -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 00:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - I think I can support now.Circeus 02:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]