Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Female Rock Vocal Performance/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 19:09, 28 June 2010 [1].
Grammy Award for Best Female Rock Vocal Performance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Another Believer (Talk) 19:09, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets FL criteria and closely resembles other Grammy-related FL lists I have nominated previously (including the companion to this list, Grammy Award for Best Male Rock Vocal Performance). The list should be up to par as far as disambig. links, alternate text, formatting, sorting, etc. go. Any feedback would be appreciated, and thanks to all reviewers for taking the time to offer their comments! Another Believer (Talk) 19:09, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments.
- According to its article, in 2005 Best Rock Vocal Performance, Solo was renamed to Best Solo Rock Vocal Performance.
- Updated lead to include alternate category title. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not everybody knows that "The Globe Sessions" and "Sheryl Crow and Friends: Live from Central Park" are albums.
- Should a change be made to the lead even though the titles are italics (as albums should be) and anyone could click on either title to confirm they are indeed albums? Personally, I think it is fairly obvious that the two titles are for albums, but I can try to make the lead clearer if needed. Thank you so much for taking time to review the list and offer feedback. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, changes should be made. Ruslik_Zero 16:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not a problem. Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 18:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, changes should be made. Ruslik_Zero 16:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Should a change be made to the lead even though the titles are italics (as albums should be) and anyone could click on either title to confirm they are indeed albums? Personally, I think it is fairly obvious that the two titles are for albums, but I can try to make the lead clearer if needed. Thank you so much for taking time to review the list and offer feedback. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ruslik_Zero 16:00, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. I do not see any more problems, so I support. Ruslik_Zero 18:57, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, after reading through this I'm not seeing any issues with the list. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 01:30, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Jujutacular T · C 01:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support Another nice list – my concerns have been addressed. Good work! Jujutacular T · C 01:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Support -- Issues resolved, meets WP:WIAFL. Great work.--Truco 503 19:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Provisional support – Didn't notice any problems with the list myself; this can be considered a full support once Truco's comments are addressed. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 02:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.