Self nomination - Yes, it's referenced properly now. I am going to add have added photos, a few are available. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Wow, you referenced like every single one. Was that necessary? Maybe, I guess, I'm not one to judge on that. Doesn't look too bad, I'm leaning towards support but I'd like the lead to explain a little bit more about the list (such as which one was the first to win gold, the one with the most medals, etc.) --Wizardman 02:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Update - photos have been added, and more information has been provided about the first gold medal winners, first female competitors, the events in which Australia are strong, who has won the most medals, most golds, most at one Olympics etc. Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to Support. --Wizardman 12:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Top job Blnguyen. Many hours have gone into that I bet. And what also amazes me is that the vast majority of those articles are substantial - there's no substubs that I could see and most are well beyond stub-dom. The list is referenced, well laid out and most importantly, useful. — Moondyne 01:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support, maybe a "See also" section might be appropriate, however I'm not one to judge. By the way, can we do a crop-job on Image:David Theile.jpg? Daniel.Bryant[ T · C ] 09:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. You've done a great job, Blnguyen! You've really taken previous comments to heart. Wholehearted support. →JARED(t) 00:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I made the references section go into two columns so it looks a little better. There are a lot, but you well-researched and that's all that counts. Also, like above, a See also'd be nice. →JARED(t) 00:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since I created the swimming portal, I may have a conflict of interest :) .Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Wow, very nice. Comprehensive, good layout, and easy to navigate. Clearly at featured level. --Xiaopo (Talk) 07:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Well referenced. Plenty of photographs, easy and interesting to read. Good job.--Dakota 02:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Well-written, illustrated, and referenced. Sure gets my support. Michaelas10(Talk) 21:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - hm, weird, I could not nitpick anything wrong with it ;) Renata 22:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The references needlessly gives the full citation for "Australia at the Olympics" for every single usage. Some other lists/articles separate the Notes (brief author(year):page) from the frequently consulted References (full citation) to avoid this. Colin°Talk 23:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
