Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Anne Hathaway on screen and stage/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Anne Hathaway on screen and stage edit

Anne Hathaway on screen and stage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Krish | Talk 07:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I think Anne Hathaway is a multi-talented actress and one of the most beautiful women I have seen. Her filmography is filled with solid box office hits and acclaimed gems, a rare combination. I feel that the list meets the FL criteria. Looking forward to lots of feedback on this.Krish | Talk 07:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Yashthepunisher
  • "The role established her as a teen idol". Provide a source for the statement.
  • The next sentence is also unsourced.
  • Alt text is missing.
  • Provide an mdash or 'TBA' in the table for Serenity.
  • Ref for Get Smart's Bruce and Lloyd: Out of Control is missing.

Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yashthepunisher: Done.Krish | Talk 19:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Aoba47
  • In this sentence (This was followed by a string of family-oriented films, including Nicholas Nickleby (2002) and Ella Enchanted (2004), all of which were unsuccessful), I would specify that you mean “financially unsuccessful”.
  • For (a recovering alcoholic in Rachel Getting Married (2008).[1][2]The role garnered several accolades), there needs to be a space between the references and “The”.
  • Specify the year in which Love & Other Drugs was released.
  • In the sentence (During this time, she also starred in a number of box-office hits such as Get Smart (2008), Bride Wars (2009) and Valentine's Day (2010).), I am not sure the transition “During this time” works in this context. You include two films, which were released before the subjects of the previous sentences (i.e. Alice in Wonderland, Love & Other Drugs, and the Simpsons). I would change the transition to something else.
I don't think anything is wrong with the transition. I can't just list all those seven/eight films to show that they all were hits. But if you have another way, Go ahead change it. I don't know how it can be done another way.Krish | Talk 18:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • For this part (she starred as a NASA scientist in Nolan's $675 million grossing science fiction film), is it really necessary to mention how much the film made? I understand the inclusion for the billion dollar making films as that is a rather large feat, but why do you include the number here? I do not think it is necessary.
  • Please add the year in which she performed in Grounded.
  • I am not sure of the placement of the year in parenthesis behind Twelfth Night as the play was obviously not released in that year. I would move it to the following placement in the sentence (in The Public Theater’s 2009 production of Twelfth Night).
  • This is more of a clarification question, but do you think that the theatre information should be more integrated into the lead rather than as it is own separate paragraph at the end? I am not against the structure, but I was just curious about the decision behind it.
  • In the “Film” table, do you think that you should link “voice” to Voice acting?
  • The lead does not make reference to the following films: The Intern, Alice Through the Looking Glass, and Colossal. I would image that these films should be present in the lead in some way.
  • For 83rd Academy Awards in the “Television” chart, should you make a note that she was co-host alongside James Franco?
  • Is there a reason for not including The Woman in White and Children and Art in the lead?
  • I do not think the “Notes” column in the “Stage” table is necessary as you do not have anything in that column.
  • The White Queen should be linked in the “Films” table.
  • Cameo appearance for Don Peyote in the “Films” table needs to be linked.

Once my comments are addressed, I will support this for promotion. All of my comments pertain to prose, and I will leave anything dealing with source use and reliability to the person who conducts the source review. Aoba47 (talk) 21:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Done.Krish | Talk 18:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 19:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 21:18, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
  • The year range in the second sentence (1999-2000) needs an en dash (as in 1999–2000).
  • After Hoodwinked!, a period isn't needed because the exclamation point serves as punctuation.
  • "The following year, she made transition to more mature roles with the acclaimed Brokeback Mountain." Needs "the" before "transition".
  • The comma after Becoming Jane should probably be taken out to polish the writing a bit there.
  • Remove the space between (2010) and the nearby comma.
  • Remove "the" from "in the Rio".
  • Another comma needs removal: the one after "biggest commercial success".
  • Also remove "the" before Tom Hooper's.
  • All caps in the title of ref 69 should be removed.
  • The hyphen in the title of ref 70 should be an en dash instead. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Giants2008: Done.Krish | Talk 08:29, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – One of the comments hadn't been resolved when I went back to check the article fixes, but for the sake of expediency I fixed the remaining issue myself. The changes that were made look good, and I think this meets the criteria now. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:18, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Kailash
  • Hathaway's breakthrough role came with the role of Mia Thermopolis in the successful Disney comedy The Princess Diaries (2001). The role established her as a teen idol and she later reprised the role in its sequel. While the phrasing is fine, you may want to write ...she later reprised the role in its sequel, Royal Engagement. to avoid violating WP:EASTEREGG.
  • In 2005, she voiced the lead character in the highly successful animated film Hoodwinked! Add a full-stop here, since the "!" is of the film's title, and not an independent punctuation.
  • Hathaway went on to voice Jewel in Rio (2011) and its sequel Rio 2 (2014). Mention Jewel's species, and the fact that Rio was an animated film.
  • As mentioned by User:Aoba47 at Trisha filmography's FLC, "make sure that all of the works and publishers are consistently cited in all of the references, and not just for the first use."
I don't think it is mandatory to link the references on every occurrence. It is a choice. And, yes he once asked me too to do that.Krish | Talk 18:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the "stage" table, decapitalise "pilot" since it is not a proper noun.
  • Some tables read "Ref(s)", one reads "Ref." Please be consistent.
  • In those roles where she plays herself, you may want to just replace "Herself" in the tables with the actress' name for sortability. Otherwise, you may retain "Herself" but link to "Anne Hathaway". Ask others which is fine.
I am sure someone will object to this.Krish | Talk 18:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's all from me. Optionally, please verify whether the lead can mention Hathaway made her voice acting debut in 2003 with the English-dub of the Japanese animated film The Cat Returns, using this source. I'm not sure if it passes WP:RS, but I don't want readers thinking The Cat Returns is an English-only film. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This film is not even noteworthy in her career or in general. I am sure dubbed films are not mentioned in the lead.Krish | Talk 18:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Kailash29792: Done.Krish | Talk 18:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support: My comments have been addressed. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 20:48, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • "short lived" should be hyphenated.
  • You could afford to increase the size of the lead image.
  • Consider merging some of the short sentences, e.g. the first and second of the lead.
  • "all of which were financially unsuccessful" reads odd after picking out two individual films.
  • " highly successful " quickly repeated...
  • "with Christopher Nolan's over $1 billion grossing superhero film The Dark Knight Rises" awkward, as you've made "$1 billion grossing" an adjective so it should be hyphenated, so I'd reword it to say something like "... superhero film ... which grossed more than $1 billion ...."

The Rambling Man (talk) 20:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Done.Krish | Talk 13:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 18:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Anne_Hathaway_on_screen_and_stage/archive1&oldid=1138478981"