Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2018 Winter Olympics medal table/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]

2018 Winter Olympics medal table

edit

2018 Winter Olympics medal table (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Hey man im josh (talk) 16:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the spirit of the upcoming Olympics, I started to working on this and it's actually my second non-American football related list nomination ever. It's based on 2022 Winter Olympics medal table, which was promoted May 14, 2023. As always, I will do my best to quickly respond to and address any and all concerns that are brought up. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images review by Staraction

edit
  • Two images (the ones not in the infobox) require alt text
  • All images are relevant to the article
  • All images are appropriately licensed (AGF on self-published works)
  • All images are captioned appropriately

Thanks for your work as always! Staraction (talk | contribs) 21:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rookie move josh, rookie move. Thanks for catching @Staraction! I've made the changes. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support on images. Staraction (talk | contribs) 18:58, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit
  • "Four new disciplines in existing sports were introduced to the Winter Olympic Games program in Pyeongchang, including" - the use of "including" implies that the examples listed are going to be a subset of the total but in fact all four are listed, so I would replace "including" with a simple colon
  • "Athletes from Germany and Norway tied [...] tying the record" - maybe change the second one to "equalling" to avoid repetition?
  • Freestyle skiing guys image caption doesn't need a full stop
  • Maybe a footnote to explain "Olympic Athletes from Russia"?
  • "After the testing of the B sample that was also positive, the Court of Arbitration for Sport confirmed that they were instituting the formal proceedings" => "After testing of the B sample that was also positive, the Court of Arbitration for Sport confirmed that they were instituting formal proceedings"
  • That's all I got - nice work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude: Thank you very much for the helpful review! I've implemented all of your suggestions, except that I tweaked your last suggestion to remove "that" from "that was also positive". Oh, I did also remove the period from Marit Bjørgen's photo, which I'm sure she would appreciate =) Hey man im josh (talk) 17:08, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:43, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MPGuy2824
  • I assume that DSQ means disqualified. It might be worth creating a template for that, with a link to Ejection (sports). If not a template, then at least the link can be considered.
    • Just chipping in to say that IMO I don't think that would be the best link to use in such a template. That article covers the concept of players (in various sports) being required to leave the match/event while it is going on because of an offence. What the "Changes in medal standings" table covers in this and similar articles is competitors who completed the event but then had their results revoked days, weeks, or even months after the event had finished. It's not really the same concept..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yup, it doesn't look like there is a good wikilink for that concept. Given that, Josh can use the {{Abbr}} template. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • You could merge the last two shortish paragraphs of the lead. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I've added the abbreviation template, that's a good call on that. I don't loooove merging those last two paragraphs, as they do feel a bit disconnected, but I also think it's a bit off to have those two sentences as their own paragraph, so I've combined them. Thank you for the review @MPGuy2824. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:32, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support promotion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments and citation check from Arconning

edit
  • Caption in image: Marit Bjørgen (pictured) won five medals at the 2018 Winter Olympics.
  • The caption in the image of the world map doesn't need a full stop.
  • Ties are usually mentioned in the medal table section of the article, based on other FLs of medal tables (to retain consistency).
  • Could mention the sport where Hungary won their first gold.
  • Will get to the source review tomorrow, just claiming it in advance. Arconning (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey @Arconning. I've made the changes to the image captions. I also expanded the sentence to call out the event for Hungary. As for the ties, I actually believe the mention that countries are sorted alphabetically if they're tied to be redundant. I don't believe there's really any other method we'd use to sort them in a tie, is there? In regards to Hungary's competition, Hey man im josh (talk) 16:45, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. COC - Reliable, though just wondering why the date's August 10, 2011?
  2. IOC - Reliable
  3. Reuters - Reliable
  4. CNN - Reliable
  5. BBC Sport - Reliable
  6. IOC - Reliable
  7. NBC Olympics - Reliable
  8. The Guardian - Reliable
  9. NYT - Reliable
  10. Yahoo! - Reliable
  11. AP - Reliable
  12. BBC - Reliable
  13. IOC - Reliable
  14. ESPN - Reliable
  15. New Zealand Herald - Reliable
  16. POCOG - Reliable
  17. IOC - Reliable, but I'm just wondering what is this used for? If it's to be kept, change the hyphen in the title to an endash.
  18. The Guardian - Reliable
  19. Daily Mirror - A bit dodgy per WP:RSPSS, but the topic isn't contentious so I'm doing a conditional pass on this one.
  20. ESPN - Reliable
  21. IOC - Reliable
  22. CBC AP - Reliable
  23. Telegraph - Reliable
  24. Inside the Games - Reliable
  25. CAS - Reliable
  26. BBC - Reliable
  27. IOC - Reliable
  • @Hey man im josh If it's part of the criteria, mentions in sources citing the International Olympic Committee, Canadian Olympic Committee, and POCOG, should be non-italicized. Also refs 8, 18, 21, and 22 could use archive links. If not, then I think it's good for me. Arconning (talk) 07:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ref 1 – Absolutely a mistake. I just tested it in my sandbox to see how I made this mistake and it turns out the autofill from RefToolbar filled in the date as August 10, 2011. I didn't expect there to be a date, so I didn't click the "Show/hide extra fields" button. I missed that and now been removed, good catch!
    • Ref 17 – I did so to reinforce that the sorting method wasn't just a one time thing. In hindsight, this is definitely overkill and unnecessary. Ref 16 is literally perfect for verifying that. I've removed this ref.
    • Archive links – All have been archived. I had to wait a little bit after triggering the archiving on them, but they're all there now.
    • Italics – Why? My understanding is it doesn't particularly matter so long as it's consistent. As far as I'm aware, and I'd absolutely appreciate being corrected if I've misunderstood, it has nothing to do with the titles of the articles themselves, it's just the style of the type of citation.
    @Arconning: Thank you so much for the source review! I hope I've addressed all of your concerns and, if not, I do intend to iron the rest out after your response. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support, nice work!! Arconning (talk) 12:45, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks so much! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Birdienest81

edit
  • As the editor who promoted the 2022 Winter Olympics medal table to featured list status, I think you should also add a table of official changes in medal standings by country similar to the ones in 1984 Summer, 2012, and 2020 ones.
  • Since the parent article 2018 Winter Olympics uses a day-month-year format, all dates indicated in the list should use the DD-MM-YYYY format.
--Birdienest81talk 19:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While I think the table in this context is useless and adds nothing of value (it was 1 medal taken and 1 given to another), I've added it anyways. I also don't see an issue with the date formatting, as it's consistent. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Birdienest81: Following up to see if the dates are a deal breaker for you. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On rethink, the dates don't actually matter to me. I've made the change and I hope you'll support this nomination @Birdienest81. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Darn, they haven't been online in five days. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:43, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, about the slow response. I'm busy preparing for a camping trip, but yes, it's all good. So, I'll give it a support. Birdienest81talk 08:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --PresN 13:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/2018_Winter_Olympics_medal_table/archive1&oldid=1239551263"