Wikipedia:Featured article review/Wind/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 2:38, 10 September 2022 (UTC) [1].
Wind edit
- Notified: Thegreatdr, Femke, WikiProject Physics, WikiProject Weather, Wikipedia:Vital articles, 2021-04-13
Review section edit
I am nominating this featured article for review because there are missing citations, updates needed in the "Wind power density" section, a six-paragraph lede that needs to be reformatted, and perhaps updating some of the sources to higher quality sources (like replacing BBC with academic journals). There is also no mention in the article about wind's use in modern literature or religion (while it is spoken about in relation to various mythologies and its interpretation in military campaigns in the shear "History" section). Should an overview of this be added in order for the article to be comprehensive? Z1720 (talk) 13:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I've removed the wind power density section, as it partially duplicated the wind power section. Wrote the power section to avoid yearly updates. Merged two paragraphs in the lede, I think a five paragraph lede works well for this article.
- The article has good bones. A couple of citations missing, most notably in the measurement section (WikiProject TC may help?). I'm unlikely to do more, but if the article needs little push to get it over the line, please ping me. Femke (talk) 14:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article is not listed at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/WikiProject Tropical cyclones, but should have a copyvio check for all the same reasons. If someone intends to save the star, I'll do that ... otherwise, no, as it is not listed at the CCI. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC No edits since Femke's work above. Concerns remain. Z1720 (talk) 01:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC ditto (t · c) buidhe 04:35, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Femke are you still interesting in trying to finish this up? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nah, I'm sorry, don't have the sources at hand, and I'm focussing my energy on a few energy-related articles. Femke (talk) 19:17, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, issues not addressed, work stalled. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section edit
- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing, comprehensiveness and currency. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist issues not addressed (t · c) buidhe 18:39, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, issues remain, no engagement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, it's sad that we couldn't get anyone to push this over the hump. Hog Farm Talk 13:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no one engaged to address my concerns. Z1720 (talk) 00:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:38, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.