Wikipedia:Featured article review/Tank/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 02:15, 3 February 2007.
Tank edit
Review commentary edit
- No original author, message left at MilHist. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Came across this page while doing other stuff and was shocked to see it featured. It may have other issues, but primarily there is a complete lack of references. It was promoted way back, and perhaps the prose is still good, but it needs going through and thoroughly referencing. Trebor 21:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Needs citations. --Ineffable3000 04:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, unresolved. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Suggested FA criteria concern is lack of citations (1c). Marskell 12:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove Insufficient inline citations. LuciferMorgan 02:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per Lucifer. And the writing problems creep into even the first sentence, which mixes British and US spellings. What is "high mobility"? "Relatively high speed"—relative to what? Tony 11:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove concerns not addressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:48, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- As nominator, am I meant to say anything here? If I am, remove, plenty of uncorrected problems. Trebor 01:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.