Wikipedia:Featured article review/Taiwanese (linguistics)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by User:Joelr31 13:25, 20 August 2008 [1].
Review commentary
editThis article was promoted to FA status in May 2004. The article may have met the FA criteria back then, but it doesn't meet the current criteria. Criterion 1c seems to be the biggest problem for this article at the moment. I haven't looked at prose yet, but I will review later to see if it meets 1a. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 15:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Definitely needs a whole host of references to stay featured. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 15:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
edit- Suggested FA criteria concern is referencing (1c). Marskell (talk) 08:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c. My concerns have yet to be addressed. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove Inline citations are advised for statements such as "how one describes Taiwanese depends largely on one's political views", and "such claims are still controversial". Prose needs tightening. Article is off-focus in parts, e.g. Taiwanese puppetry and cuisine. Obsolete image tag on Image:Taiwanese Bible Chim-gian 1933.jpg could be updated. External links should be trimmed. DrKiernan (talk) 11:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove 1c. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove. There is a lack of sufficient inline citations, as well as a mix of footnotes and embedded external links. The lead section insufficiently summarizes the content. maclean 04:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.