Wikipedia:Featured article review/Seabiscuit/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 03:50, 21 April 2007.
Seabiscuit edit
Review commentary edit
- Message left at GWO. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Messages left at Seabiscuit and Thoroughbred racing.
Doesn't satisfy 1(c). One source, and for something that barely matters in the article. Doesn't really satisfy 1(a) either. Jerichi~Profile~Talk~ 15:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Jerichi. We don't "sup", "opp", "rm" or "kp" at this point. We try for a couple weeks of commentary, and hopefully improvements, and then move the review to FARC. Marskell 16:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My bad. I'm a little new to the Featured Article area; I tend to work more around the GA area. Jerichi~Profile~Talk~ 19:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- remove there are no secondary sources, and only one thing is sourced.--Sefringle 20:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Suggested FA criteria concern is citations (1c), and prose (1a). Marskell 08:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional concern There are two unfree images, neither of which contain a fair use rationale. Jay32183 18:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Remove for deficiency of references. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c. Send me a message if things change drastically change. Quadzilla99 09:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove - If anyone can help add citations and fair use rationales, let us know. This article needs a lot of citations and the two unfree images must contain fair use rationales. This article really needs a lot of work on the citations and fair use rationales on the two unfree images. Sjones23 20:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 22:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per Nomination Jerichi~Profile~Talk~ 01:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.