Wikipedia:Featured article review/Restoration literature/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by Dana boomer 13:31, 27 December 2010 [1].

Restoration literature edit

Review commentary edit

Featured article candidates/Restoration literature

Notified: Geogre, WikiProject Literature

I am nominating this featured article for review because I stumbled across it and was amazed to see how lacking it is in inline citations. There are a total of thirteen inline cites. Editors were advised of the issue nearly two years ago. Thus, the article badly fails criterion 2c. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:23, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos to the editor who pointed it out! Good work, that. Reading the FAR from four years ago, almost, leads me to believe two things: Standards are higher, and if some of the people involved said the same things today, they'd be laughed off the island.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was this the one where I was told that I was unqualified to review articles unless I worked on an article of this "caliber" (deemed an "unlikely event")? Actually, I think that incident occurred later that year. WRT the article, it definitely needs citations per Wikipedia's fundamental style. It's quite comprehensive and reasonably well written; lack of citations is the big obstacle here. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 04:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: nope, it was that one. Let's hope everyone remains civilized this time around. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 04:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary edit

The main featured article criteria of concern brought up in the review section was referencing. Dana boomer (talk) 01:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Per the comments made above. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.