Wikipedia:Featured article review/Open cluster/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 01:05, 22 June 2009 [1].
Open cluster edit
Review commentary edit
- Listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomy/Article alerts; main editor vanished
Today I have improved a lot the number of references of this article, but it looks still so incomplete: no information about observation, about age and how to calculate it, and some sections are short (just make a comparison between this article and globular cluster). If you don't agree, close this review, but I remain on my opinion. :-) --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 04:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment on first view referencing looks a little sparse. Should't be too hard to save though (?) Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Most paras have one cite. Do these account for the entire (or most) of the para? YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 00:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Suggested FA criteria concerns are comprehensiveness and citations. Joelito (talk) 23:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Also not much done to improve article since FAR nom started. Cirt (talk) 11:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.