Wikipedia:Featured article review/Irish poetry/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 11:06, 1 December 2007.
Irish poetry edit
Review commentary edit
- Notified User:Vanderesch, WikiProject Ireland. Ceoil 08:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A 2003 promotion, the article would need to be entirely rewritten to meet todays standard. From a poor base, it has depreciated slowly over time, through tack on edits and random mentions of non notables. Fails all criteria, in my eyes. Origional nominator has left. Ceoil 07:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Suggested FA criteria concerns are all of them (in the opinion of the venerable Ceoil). -- Marskell (talk) 18:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The nominator is the one I'd hope might fix this. -- Marskell (talk) 18:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I have to say that 0 inline citations makes it a poor FA. There's certainly potential for A/Good classification, but not what I've come to expect from a featured article. -- i kan reed (talk) 19:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove—1a, MOS issues (Titles that start with "The", to start with), and—OMG—1c. A literary topic must be written to very high standards or it insults the subject. Tony (talk) 05:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove. I've been meaning to nominate this one for some time. Haukur (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I will happily work on this article but right now an still working on rescuing George Moore, so will be unlikely to get around to helping this before the FAR closes. Do what you must—it seems like there are few Irish Wikipedians who really care about quality right now to take on the FARs of Irish article. It's a pity. ww2censor (talk) 04:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.