Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ina Garten/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 5:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Air.dance, Javaweb, WP Women writers, WP Food and drink
- URFA nom
- Talk page notified Jan 2015
Review section
editThis is a 2005 FA that has taken on uncited text; there are other issues also noted on talk. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:46, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I actually came onto this article's talk page with the intent of suggesting that this article be sent to FAR. There is a lot of un-referenced prose in this article; this being the case, it would not pass a GAN today, let alone a FAC. At this current stage I would be inclined toward de-listing it. Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, no edits, no progress, no one working on it. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC only edit since the start of the FAR is someone refining a category. BencherliteTalk 00:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
edit- Main concern: verifiability. DrKiernan (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no progress. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist this has quite a bit of uncited text. I also see inconsistent citation formats and incomplete citations, as well as a list of "References" that confusingly are not cited. It appears the article is somewhat out of date: she won another daytime Emmy after the one mentioned in the text. The "Barefoot Contessa other publications" section is strangely named and seems to have acquired all manner of cruft. Maralia (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.