Wikipedia:Featured article review/Hours of service/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC) [1].

Hours of service

Notified: User talk:ErgoSum88, WT:TRUCKS, WT:LAW, WT:OSH, talk page notification 2021-09-20

Review section

This FA (2008 promotion) has some significant issues with respect to sourcing and comprehensiveness. The article is predominantly sourced to primary sources, such as regulations and government websites: never a good sign. A quick Google Scholar search finds a significant amount of secondary coverage, much of it recent, that isn't used. See [2][3][4][5][6] for just a few examples; an in-depth examination would likely find much more. The dearth of scholarly sourcing is problematic on its own, but it also results in an article that spends more time repeating the text of government regulations than it does summarizing encyclopedically the various perspectives on the subject. There are also issues with uncited text (e.g. in the "Rewriting the Hours of Service" section), bare URLs/incomplete citations, and due-weight/currency concerns noted by Hog Farm in his talk-page notice. Since there have been no significant improvements since notice was given almost three months ago, the article's featured status ought to be reviewed. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:50, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC no edits (t · c) buidhe 05:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC, nothing happening. Hog Farm _Talk 16:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC, no improvements since nomination at FAR. Z1720 (talk) 17:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC – concerns have not been addressed. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and comprehensiveness. DrKay (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist since the issues mentioned above continue to stand and the article hasn't been touched in nearly a month. Noah^Talk 03:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist concerns remain, no major edits since FAR nom. Z1720 (talk) 18:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. No progress: the only recent edit was Illuminati-related vandalism. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - the only "engagement" was vandalism. Hog Farm _Talk 14:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.