Wikipedia:Featured article review/History of Sheffield/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC) [1].
History of Sheffield edit
- Notified: JeremyA, WikiProject Sheffield, WikiProject Yorkshire, WikiProject History, WikiProject Cities, WikiProject United Kingdom, 2021-02-05, 2021-11-17
Review section edit
I am nominating this featured article for review because of unsourced statements, the lede containing information that is not cited in the body, and the article needs an update with current developments. The talk page also contains a large to-do list, so the article might not be comprehensive enough. Z1720 (talk) 16:09, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no progress on sourcing issues (t · c) buidhe 05:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, no edits since August. Hog Farm Talk 16:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section edit
- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing, layout, datedness and comprehensiveness. DrKay (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist The issues above still stand. I see plenty of sentences that lack citations. NoahTalk 03:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist limited engagement, issues remain. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist limited engagement, work still needed. Hog Farm Talk 14:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.