Wikipedia:Featured article review/Henry James/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by Dana boomer 16:13, 5 June 2010 [1].
Henry James edit
Review commentary edit
Henry James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: WikiProjects
Article is unsourced in many parts. Many of these passages are not equivocal fact, but relate to critical analysis and classification. The whole legacy section is not sourced, most notably the summarising claim at the front. Various things are labelled as trend-setting or turning points but are not sourced YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:56, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Featured article criterion of concern are sourcing YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:39, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:39, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist unless a referencer appears; the article itself seems pretty good, but the early sections in particular need more refs. The main author retired in 2007. Johnbod (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - Due to the sourcing problems and that there's no one working on the problems. GamerPro64 (talk) 19:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.