Wikipedia:Featured article review/Green and golden bell frog/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 2:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC) [1].
Green and golden bell frog edit
- Notified: YellowMonkey, Froggydarb, Tnarg 12345, Hpesoj, EcoJay, WP Australia, WP Amphibians and Reptiles, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Zealand, noticed in June 2021
Review section edit
As noted over a year ago by Femkemilene, this 2006 FA promotion has become extremely dated in the conservation section, including text such as "The numbers of green and golden bell frogs are estimated to have declined by more than 30% in the past 10 years" being cited to a source from 2004, and much of that section is cited to a "draft for public comment" from 2005. This needs heavily updated. It's unclear to me how well the prose has been watched over as well, as a random sentence fragment of "very low" has been present since before Femke's talk page comments, and there is an uncited paragraph. Hog Farm Talk 16:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, needs serious updating in places. Hog Farm Talk 19:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC: updates are needed, but no edits since April. Z1720 (talk) 22:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC needs a lot of work. AryKun (talk) 11:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section edit
- Issues raised in the review section include currency and sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, zero progress. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, nothing happening. Hog Farm Talk 01:41, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no evidence that there has been a "thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature" (WIAFA 1c), and therefore I doubt the article is comprehensive (WIAFA 1b). --159.196.100.171 (talk) 02:06, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no progress on issues. Z1720 (talk) 13:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.