Wikipedia:Featured article review/Genesis (band)/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 02:33, 30 June 2010 [1].
Genesis (band) edit
Review commentary edit
Genesis (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: User:AreJay, Progressive Rock, WikiProject Musicians, WikiProject Rock music, WikiProject Biography
I am nominating this featured article for review because of the sourcing problems in the article. There are parts of the article that have no references, with one section, "1978–1979: And Then There Were Three", not having any citations at all. GamerPro64 (talk) 19:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Featured article criterion of concern are sourcing. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 04:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - No comprehensive work has been done on this article since it was nominated. There are still large unsourced areas, including many quotes and statistics, as well as several dead links and in-text external links. Also, I'm concerned if the "high quality sources" criteria is being met, as quite a few web sites of dubious reliability and quality are being used over book- and journal-based sources such as this and this. Dana boomer (talk) 13:32, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - Per no problems were addressed in my review. GamerPro64 (talk) 13:35, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.