Wikipedia:Featured article review/Cat's Eye Nebula/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was kept by Marskell 23:28, 21 September 2009 [1].
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Main contributor and nominator Worldtraveller. Only one project attached to article, WikiProject Astronomy.
I am nominating this featured article for review because it currently lacks inline citations, criteria 1(c) - it was nominated 4 years ago. I've restored one section that got deleted by vandalism 2 years ago. Tom B (talk) 14:59, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Done; thanks.
Images lack alt text as per WP:ALT.Eubulides (talk) 06:04, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Added. Materialscientist (talk) 12:18, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I made an {{editprotected}} request to mark the coordinate icon in {{Sky}} as being purely decorative, which should handle the last final detail here. Eubulides (talk) 18:45, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Added. Materialscientist (talk) 12:18, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Ruslik is making good progress on this. ceranthor 16:18, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "and was the first planetary nebula whose spectrum was investigated by the English amateur astronomer William Huggins in 1864." - it is unclear whether it was the first nebula to be studied, or first nebula studied by Huggins.
- Harvard citation looks awkward for journals. Shall I convert journals to in-line cites? Materialscientist (talk) 12:18, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I fixed problems with lack of inline citations and alt text. I also expanded the lead. I think, the article can be kept now. Ruslik_Zero 16:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- good job, hopefully this can be kept now, Tom B (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Have reliability of sources and image licensing been checked before this is kept? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image review - Fine, no problems. Black Kite 00:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.