Wikipedia:Featured article review/Antarctic krill/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 23:40, 18 May 2010 [1].
Antarctic krill edit
Review commentary edit
Antarctic krill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Arthropods, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Antarctica, User talk:Lupo, User talk:Kils, User talk:Yakuzai
FA from 2005, has some 1c issues, and some copyediting needs and some short paragraphs/sections. 10 images used in the article, could use a pass through of an image review for those. The lede/intro of the article fails WP:LEAD - it is a bit too short and does not adequately summarize the entire article and function as a standalone introduction and summary to the article's contents. -- Cirt (talk) 22:39, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, lots of unsourced info. First section after the intro is very short and unsourced. (And why do we have an article on West Wind Drift but not East Wind Drift?) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:30, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreeing, needs some expansion and a lot more buffing up on the sourcing. "Biomass and production" has only one citation in the beginning of it, "Geographical distribution" has none, "Bioluminescence" needs a lot more, and the entire "Food" section and subsections need better sourcing. • ɔ ʃ → 14:56, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Featured article criterion of concern are sources, lead YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist for lack of sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:45, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, largely uncited, and no one has even attempted to work on the article. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, nom issues not addressed, in addition to above concerns by TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) and Fetchcomms (talk · contribs). -- Cirt (talk) 16:59, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.