Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Xbox 360/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 22:39, 13 June 2007.
The Xbox 360 page has good info and is very popular. --Danny Phantom Phantom... 02:06, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Page failed GA, unsourced statements, poor copywriting in places. A page with "good info" and "very popular" is not valid reasoning behind promoting a page to FA. Anthony Hit me up... 14:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It could really, really do with an image or two of key games. That afterall if what its all about really. How many pictures of microchips do you need and not one game screenshot? Very good though.Whataboutbob 22:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The lead surely could do a better job of collectively summarizing the mass of text here. Sigh; yet another drive by nomination, top contributors listed below. -- Phoenix2 (holla) 15:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"yet another drive by nomination" What's wrong with that? Also where did you get those stats? Buc 18:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not significant enough an issue that's worth immediate opposition, so I didn't. Some articles that are nominated under such circumstances are ready. Simply put, it's a lot easier for the nominator to act upon objections if he has actively contributed to the article. Said tool can be found here [1]. -- Phoenix2 (holla) 00:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.