Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/What would Jesus do?/archive1

A terrific article. Displays clear, unconfusing, and accurate information.Chipka 19:09, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About which book? Object - complete lack of references. It also seems rather thin, but I don't know how much it's possible to write encyclopedically about a phrase... —Whouk (talk) 19:48, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- the contrary. ～J.K. 11:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support - It is a wonderful article. Very well done! To Whouk, What are you talking about? Lorty 20:26, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object: See WP:WIAFA; specifically it fails criterion 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, possibly 3c, and 4. Image:WWJD.jpg needs a fair use rationale- see WP:FUC. The lead should be expanded to meet WP:LEAD. The article lacks references, and also doesn't have WP:FOOTNOTEs or other inline citations. Thanks, AndyZ _t 20:42, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no references. It is as it always was ^{T | @ | C} 20:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral please provide references and inline citations, correct the above deficiencies, and I'll be glad to have another look. If you need an example of how to cite references, you can see Tourette syndrome. Sandy 23:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]