Oppose No references. WP 11:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No references, also no history. There are also a lot of lists. Check other previous featured articles such as Duke University to see how they are setup. KnightLago 12:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This should be submitted for WP:PR. Peer Review is almost a prerequisite to FA status. KnightLago 03:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per above. -- Szvest 18:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. In fact, I'm tempted to remove this nom per WP:SNOW. (Though, on the positive side, it is pretty well written). Mikker(...) 02:16, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per all of the above. Did anyone mention the external jumps? Sandy 02:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, try PR first and compare to other university articles that are recent FAs. Agree with above reviewers. Rlevse 10:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Rename it Santa Claus University and then we'll talk. I've always thought of a career in the lucrative Mall Santa business. But seriously, all negative points have been addressed above. --Sean WI 06:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
