Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Same-sex marriage in Canada/archive1

I think this is one amazingly written article, and deserves to be recognized by the community. Ardenn 19:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose -- History section largely depends on external links instead of prose. Lead section is too long, contains a bulleted list and is not an efficient summary of the article. A numnber of single-sentence paragraphs. A referencing style needs to be chosen and implemented. Plenty to do (but probably can be accomplished during candidacy). Jkelly 19:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – agree completely with Jkelly –Joke 00:55, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object per above. Flcelloguy (A note?) 21:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]