Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Raya and the Last Dragon/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 22 June 2021 [1].

Raya and the Last Dragon edit

Nominator(s): Wingwatchers (talk) 00:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it meets the FA criteria, I have also had many mistakes listed on the previous archive corrected. Wingwatchers (talk)

@Wingwatchers: Have you asked the FAC coordinators to waive the waiting period for nominating an article for FAC? Per WP:FAC: None of the nominators may nominate or co-nominate any article for two weeks unless given leave to do so by a coordinator. The last nomination was archived on 17 June 2021, 5 days before today. Also, you transcluded this at the bottom of the FAC page (it's meant to be at the top). Pamzeis (talk) 01:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pamzeis:, sorry I have no idea about this time limit. Is there a way to switch to somebody else? Wingwatchers (talk) 02:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wingwatchers: I think it's best if you just withdraw it (use {{@FAC}} to ping the coordinators). I don't have much FAC experience but I think it's usually waived if the previous FAC did not get much feedback. You can still ask the coordinators to waive it though. And I don't mean to discourage you but I don't think this article is up to FA quality. You should probably try to get it up to a good article status as the GA criteria is less strict. Pamzeis (talk) 03:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging FAC coordinators about this (@FAC coordinators: ). Pamzeis (talk) 07:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tks Pamzeis. Wingwatchers, the bit about the two-week waiting period after a nom is archived, which Pamzies quotes, is in the instructions at the top of WP:FAC. I'm not disposed to waiving that waiting period given there was more than cursory commentary at the last nom. Now you are not required to put the article through GAN and/or Peer Review, as was recommended at the previous FAC, but you do need to at least wait the standard two weeks and do everything you can to act on the comments that came up at that FAC. One of the reasons I would again strongly recommend GAN or, especially, PR, is that you might well get further pointers for improvement prior to another nomination here. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 09:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.