Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rail transport/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 19:02, 9 April 2008.
I'm nominating this article for featured article because I believe it is a very important subject aroud the World. Actually I am translating the article Rail transport in India (that is already Featured) for pt.wiki, and I thought this deserves too as the main article of the subject. A very complete article, many images, etc. Danilo P (talk) 00:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danilo P (talk • contribs) 00:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I note that according to article stats Danilo hasn't been a major contributor to the article. I also note that are large sections of the article unreferenced, the See also section is huge, the references (what there are) are a mess (What ref is Awdry? Lewin? Robertson? etc.) Ealdgyth - Talk 01:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, article's talk page has a long "to do" list, showing that its main editors are aware it is not ready for FA.--Grahame (talk) 02:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Danilo has correctly identified that this ought to be a Featured Article. I identified much the same last year, although I suggested we should aim for GA first! The ToDo list was drawn-up at this time, and several editors did put some work into it. The collaborative effort died-away after a few days, presumably as editors worked on more tightly-defined pages. (I include myself among their number, unfortunately, partly because I felt I was working alone.) I think a major problem is that this article needs some substantial restructuring, especially as it main-links to several more articles that are nearly as important and are in a similar state! This restructuring requires a high-level view of the topic, and I think we are all guilty of being interested in areas of the topic rather than the topic as a whole. Ideas for how we move this forward would be welcome! -- EdJogg (talk) 12:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose:Major part of the content lacks in-line citation, hence fails 2c. of WP:FACr - KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not yet ready. --Dweller (talk) 15:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Omits any mention of rails with trails or links to Wikipedia articles about them. Also omits the very relevant and important topic of trans-shipment, the linkages between railways and ships and trucks. I suggest that the nominator withdraw the nomination, fix the issues already identified in this FAC, and help to get this article through the GA process and/or peer review before its next FAC nomination. --Una Smith (talk) 21:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.